I’m
sure the Chicago Police Department has fantasies about being able to put to
rest all those people who have spent months complaining (years actually, but it’s
only recently we’ve started listening) about the treatment of black people by
law enforcement personnel.
Yet
anybody who believes that the decision announced Thursday to fire seven police
officers because of their connection to the October 2014 shooting death of
Laquan McDonald will in any way ease the tensions that have arisen is living in
a serious fantasy-land.
FOR
THOSE WITH the short memories, the McDonald shooting death by police is that
one captured on a squad car video camera – the one for which officer Jason Van
Dyke now faces criminal charges of multiple murder counts and only remains free
now because he had friends capable of posting the $1.5 million bail that was
set for him.
But
police Superintendent Eddie Johnson sent out an e-mail message to police
informing them that seven other officers will face the ultimate professional
discipline – they’re going to have to relinquish their badge and gun and be
reduced to the role of mere mortals.
No
longer will they have a special claim to police powers, or the authority to
legally carry a weapon for their use in protecting the public from danger.
Although
there are those who’d argue that the police themselves are the dangerous
element because it is one way too willing to make presumptions based on race
about who represents a danger to the public.
JOHNSON
SAID HE made his decision to try to terminate the seven officers based on his
belief that the statements they made about what happened the night McDonald
died from 16 gunshots were not totally truthful.
As
if we could have resolved this matter much sooner if those officers had come
out and told the truth about what happened between Van Dyke and McDonald.
Yet
considering how entrenched the mentality is within law enforcement of an “us
versus them” paradigm, I doubt that knowing a few police officers will lose
their jobs will pacify anyone.
I
already can envision police officers and their supporters claiming that these
cops were being sacrificed to try to appease troublemakers, while let’s not
forget that the Black Lives Matter movement consists of people who seriously
call for the abolishment of law enforcement.
LARGELY
BECAUSE THEY mistrust the motives of anyone who would want to be in a position
of authority over other individuals.
Trying
to claim that letting seven cops go (even though the city’s Inspector General
did its own investigation that concluded 10 cops should lose their jobs) will
somehow resolve the situation just won’t do.
This
attitude we have in our society, the split between police and a portion of the
public, goes beyond any one case. It certainly isn’t limited to Chicago – which
is why I have always thought those people who try to place blame on Rahm
Emanuel are being just a tad absurd.
Heck,
a large part of the dynamic that is spurring the presidential campaign of
Donald Trump to linger on even though his own actions would totally devastate a
lesser candidate is those individuals who want to rant and rage about the need
for law and order.
AS
IN THE people who will complain the loudest should the day come when Van Dyke
is found guilty of murder; the ones who wish they could follow through on Trump’s
response to recent rioting in the Milwaukee area by shooting the troublemakers –
most of whom in that instance were black people.
And
for whom their “bullet” will be the ballot they cast on or before Nov. 8 (if
they go early voting) for Trump as president.
Trump
has tried to tone down his talk by saying his talk of “law and order” is aimed
at black people, who often suffer from the violence. Although it is spoken to
white people who want to knee-jerk react to the sight of African-American
individuals by lashing out in some violent form.
Until
we can overcome that attitude in our society, the only thing that firing a few
police officers will accomplish is adding to the ranks of the unemployed.
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment