GARLAND: He can have Supreme Court dreams |
About
the one thing that isn’t at stake is the chance that Merrick Garland –
currently the chief judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia – will become a Supreme Court justice any time soon.
ON
THE DAY after Election Day in his home state of Illinois and four other places –
ones in which Hillary Clinton did well and Democratic Party renegade Bernie
Sanders saw his chances slip (although he insists he’s not even dreaming of
leaving the race) – Obama made it known he has made a pick to fill the vacancy
caused by the death last month of Antonin Scalia.
Although
there was some speculation that Obama could name the first Indian-American to
serve on the high court and also at one point considered a justice from the
appeals court for San Francisco (considered the most liberal in the nation), in
the end Obama picked Garland.
Considering
the Obama presidency previously gave us two women (one of Puerto Rican ethnic
origins) as its Supreme Court picks, it would seem that the choice of Garland
was meant to be safe.
Except
that when it comes to this issue, nothing is “safe.”
OBAMA: Calling GOP's bluff |
FOR
THE REPUBLICAN majority that controls the U.S. Senate that will have to confirm
any choice the president makes has already made it known it does not want Obama
to have the pick.
They
are content to let the court operate one short for just over the next year so
that the next president (whom they fantasize will be a Republican) makes the
pick.
It’s
not just that they don’t want Obama to have this one pick – they don’t want him
going into the history books as having been the guy who got to pick one-third
of the Supreme Court of the United States.
They
don’t want him doing what their alleged idol, Ronald Reagan, did, which was to
stack the Supreme Court and other federal courts with judges who had an
ideological sense of what the law was all about. Those picks have lived on much
longer than he did.
REAGAN: Not ready for Ronnie's legacy to die |
IT
MUST BE a real smack in the face if Obama (the man they ideologically and
racially detest) gets to be the guy who undoes what Reagan did.
Which
is the part that gets to me. Some Republican types openly admit their desire is
to keep the Supreme Court from going “liberal.” Either because that’s just
their leaning, or because they really think it was ordained by God himself that
the nation’s high court be biased in their favor.
My
sense is that the choice of Garland is meant to provide the Republican leadership
with a white male lacking in liberal leanings (albeit one who’s Jewish) for
whom the easy thing to do would be for the GOP to accept his appointment.
This
way, if they do wind up turning him down – or better yet, not even consider him
– it can all be blamed on political partisanship.
THERE
ALREADY HAS been political trash talk advising Democrats of the need to vote
because we don’t want Donald Trump or Ted Cruz making a Supreme Court
appointment. That rhetoric will be stepped up so high, and will be used by
every Democrat seeking political office.
CLINTON: Will Hillary make the REAL pick? |
While
some people will probably vote Republican just because of that, Obama is
gambling that the voice of real people in this country will be so outraged that
he ultimately wins.
And
that a future “President Hillary Clinton” will wind up getting to make the
appointment of the real replacement for Scalia.
Although
it’s kind of a shame that Garland is not likely to gain the position – although
Harvard-educated, he is Chicago-born and raised in suburban Lincolnwood; the
perfect end to the legacy of the first Chicago resident of significance to rise
to the ranks of U.S. president.
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment