BUSTOS: Out, w/o ever being in |
An announcement, I’m sure, that elicited a whole lot of yawns from political geeks, particularly those from the Chicago area, who probably figured that a Bustos candidacy wouldn’t have had a chance of succeeding anyway.
THEN
AGAIN, I’M figuring there are probably many people who live in the other third
of Illinois (a.k.a., downstate) who are thinking it equally ridiculous that 47th
Ward Alderman Ameya Pawar has delusions of someday being allowed to live in the
Executive Mansion in Springfield.
PAWAR: Can he gain political traction? |
Yet
Pawar was the first person to declare himself an actual candidate – a status
that Bustos never made it to. Even though there were some who figured that she
had a chance to gain some votes just because she would have been the only significant
candidate for governor from outside of the Chicago metro area.
Except
that I think the kind of people who are inclined to want to vote in elections
for someone from outside of Chicago are exactly the kind of people who will
unite in 2018 behind Bruce Rauner’s re-election dreams.
Because
his “Dump Madigan” strategy is really one that will only appeal to non-Chicago
people. Those of us more urban voters will see the strategy for the nonsense
that it is – because we know our local political officials aren’t nearly as
united behind anybody, particularly the Illinois House speaker, as they want to
believe.
Are we really destined for a Kennedy ... |
IF
IT TURNS out that Rauner dominates the rural Illinois vote, there might not be
enough non-Chicago voters left for any other campaign to gain significant political
support from.
The
real significance of Bustos’ announcement that she prefers to run for another
term in Congress is that the gubernatorial field is starting to shrink – even though
we have just over a year before any votes are cast in that particular primary
election.
Although
it may still be a few months before the candidate field winnows down to where
we can say who is actually running. And I still won’t be surprised if there’s
at least one person who winds up running a serious campaign whose name hasn’t
emerged yet.
... vs. Pritzker brawl to see who wins ... |
I
know some political observers are determined to view this upcoming election
cycle as the Chris Kennedy vs. J.B. Pritzker primary. Although I’m pretty sure
there are others of the Democratic persuasion who would wretch at the very
thought.
THE
IDEA OF the politically-top heavy family taking on the family with enough cash
that they could afford to match the millions of his own money that Rauner says
he will spend to try to get himself re-elected ALONG WITH a Legislature more to
his liking than the incumbents.
They
may think that a Democratic version of Rauner (ie., a rich guy) is the last
thing the party needs, just like some Dems are going to forevermore be
convinced that we’d be spared the thought of a “President Donald J. Trump” if
only voters last year had dumped Hillary Clinton and gone with Bernie Sanders
instead.
But
then again, I wonder how many people aren’t going to be enthused about the
notion of Illinois getting its very own Kennedy. The family has had members run
for political posts in so many states, but our own local Kennedy tales focus on
how Chicago supposedly “won” the 1960 presidential election for Chris’ “Uncle
Jack.”
I
don’t doubt that many voters will be desperately scouring all the other names
in search of somebody, anybody, else whose candidacy they can latch onto in
their desire to beat Bruce Rauner.
... the right to challenge Rauner come Nov. '18? |
BECAUSE
THEY FIGURE the absolute last thing Illinois needs is to have eight years
without a budget. Yes, political people really are capable of being that
stubborn, unless voters themselves take matters into their own hands at the
ballot box.
I
really do believe that Rauner is vulnerable because of the inability of state
government to operate the way it’s supposed to. While some will be willing to
blame Madigan, this is still an urban-leaning state politically.
But
the inability to pick a credible candidate to challenge Rauner is most
definitely why no one should write off his chances of getting “four more years”
and giving us voters more partisan agonies to endure.
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment