LIGHTFOOT: Already upsetting some people |
In
fact, the very idea that caused many of them to excitedly cast votes for Lori
Lightfoot as mayor in the hopes that she’d use her mayoral powers to put a halt
to.
SO
WITH THAT in mind, there are many activist types who already are feeling sold
out by the fact that Lightfoot let it be known late Wednesday that there isn’t
much of anything she can do to stop the projects known as Lincoln Yards and the
78s.
Basically,
Lightfoot isn’t about to conduct herself as mayor in the manner that Donald
Trump has behaved during his presidency – as in trying to abolish or repeal anything
(and I mean ANYTHING) that was once supported by Barack Obama.
Lightfoot
is going to let stand the proposals that Emanuel is likely to sign into law
during his final weeks of his mayorality.
Lightfoot
gave lip service to the concept of holding accountable the developers who are
behind the real estate developments that are meant to create new communities
along the north (Lincoln Yards) and south (the 78s) branches of the Chicago
River.
SHE
SAYS SHE will “engage with the community and committed activists who have forcefully
advocated for affordable housing, park space and the responsible use of tax
increment financing dollars for many months.”
But
when you consider that activist-types usually aren’t pleased unless they can
say their actions caused some undesirable proposal to be killed off, this kind
of legalese is likely to create the perception that Lightfoot hasn’t even taken
the oath of office yet – and she’s already falling short of perceptions by her
backers.
Now
I’ll be the first to admit to not following the Lincoln Yards debate closely,
or that of the 78s that offers up a sort-of South Side response to the proposal
meant to create a wealthy community near the already-wealthy Lincoln Park
neighborhood.
LINCOLN YARDS: Desired by some, detested by others |
BUT
WHAT CATCHES my attention about all of this is Lightfoot’s reaction – or lack
thereof.
In
reality, there’s nothing she could do since she’s not mayor yet. Unless she’d
be prepared to start engaging in the same kind of reckless, irresponsible behavior
that Trump is doing to try to erase any trace that Obama of Hyde Park ever was
permitted to set foot in the Oval Office.
But
Lightfoot is realistic. She’s not looking to provoke political brawls with
people who could take down her mayorality before it even starts. Anybody who
expects her to do so is being absurd.
Not
that this surprises me. Personally, I came out of the recently-completed
mayoral election cycle thinking there really wasn’t much difference between
Lightfoot and Toni Preckwinkle – and that many of the Lightfoot backers have created
a false image of Lightfoot that bears little reality to who the woman is or how
she intends to govern.
IT’S
A LARGE part of why I have trouble taking seriously all the talk of this being
an election cycle of a historic nature. I don’t think many of us have a clue
what to expect from Lori Lightfoot – the mayoral years.
A new mayor, but same policies? |
That
shouldn’t be interpreted as a slam or as praise for her. It means we ought to
pay attention to what happens in coming months. For as Lightfoot says of the two
real estate deals, “we’re going to be able to exercise a tremendous amount of
control and it’s going to be able to give us the opportunity to bring community
voices into the process that didn’t happen before.”
If
it happens, it could be encouraging for Chicago. In a way that a knee-jerk negative
reaction to all that happened before her would wind up being reckless and
ridiculous.
The
“jury” is still out on what kind of mayor Lori Lightfoot will be. The last thing
we need is a jury determined to convict her of incompetence because she didn’t
give them a pre-ordained verdict of their ideological choosing.
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment