FOR
THOSE OF you with short attention spans, Newman was the suburban woman who
challenged Lipinski on the notion that he’s too conservative on social issues
to be allowed to think of himself as a Democrat in good standing.
Lipinski
managed to prevail in the Democratic primary – winning 51 percent to 49
percent. Largely because the Illinois 3rd Congressional district
consists largely of Chicago’s Southwest Side neighborhoods, where many voters
look upon it as a plus that Lipinski’s father is former Congressman and Alderman
Bill Lipinski.
He
also represents that segment of the populace that thinks Democrats ought to be
a blue-collar political party that ought not be too concerned with the social
issues such as abortion (of which Lipinski is solidly in opposition).
There
were those people who think that’s not what the Democrats ought to be about any
longer, and they did try to use Newman to dump Dan from office – falling just
short of a primary victory.
NEWMAN
APPARENTLY IS thinking along the lines of, “I came close to winning last time,
this time will be the charm.”
NEWMAN: Trying again in 2020 |
That
led her to saying on Tuesday she’s running again for Congress. She’ll challenge
Lipinski once again – and hopes she can find another 2 percent of voter support
to give her a victory this time. While another person, Abe Matthew of Chicago’s
Bridgeport neighborhood, says he’ll also run – thereby clogging up the
political mechanisms.
Personally,
I always get skeptical of candidates who come close to winning, but fail.
Political history is filled with many such tales of people who tried again –
only to wind up falling short by nowhere near as small a voter margin as they
lost by the first time.
LIPINSKI: Can he fight her off again? |
Remember
H. Ross Perot – who in 1992 ran an independent political campaign that managed
to take 19 percent of the overall vote and was a factor in incumbent President
George Bush’s failure to beat Democrat Bill Clinton?
THAT
LED THE Texas billionaire to think he had potential for a significant political
movement, and he tried again in 1996. Only to fall so far short (8 percent
overall) that I suspect most people these days have forgotten he ever existed
politically.
Could
Newman wind up embarrassing herself in a similar manner?
Lipinski
himself told the Chicago Sun-Times, “I would be surprised if Marie Newman runs
again after her angry, mean-spirited speech on TV on Election Night.” Looking
around the Internet, various people commented she was “downright bitter” and “didn’t
concede with any class.”
Did
Newman really manage to create a lasting image at the end of her last campaign
that kills off any hopes for a political future? Or is this merely wishful
thinking on the part of Lipinski that he won’t have to seriously campaign for
re-election in 2020?
MY
OWN CHECK of the Internet for Election Night video unveiled a snippet of Newman
saying, “I would like for Mr. Lipinski to have a very painful evening,” while
refusing to admit political defeat. While Rich Miller of the Capitol Fax newsletter
said of Newman’s behavior, “I’ve seen much worse.”
PEROT '96: A long-forgotten campaign |
It
probably helps that many have let the Lipinski/Newman primary slip into the crevasses
of their minds – remembering more clearly the general election campaign against
Art Jones – a political activist with past ties to neo-Nazi and white supremacist
organizations.
Which
meant the Republican Party had to go out of its way to dissociate themselves
from him. The real question for 2020 may be to see if the Illinois GOP remains
so weak and unorganized that it won’t be able to put up a legitimate challenger
to Lipinski as what happened in 2018?
As
opposed to whether Newman can hold together all the people eager to see a
less-ideologically-motivated person than Lipinski represent them in Congress –
while figuring out a way to get 2 percent more voter support for herself.
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment