Showing posts with label Calumet City. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Calumet City. Show all posts

Monday, February 13, 2017

EXTRA: ‘Early voting’ for a few, nothing for the electoral masses

If you happen to live in Evanston to the north, Berwyn to the west, or Calumet City or Dolton to the south, then Monday is a day of significance.
ORR:Staff among few aware elections are forthcoming

It’s the first day you can show up at an early voting center and cast ballots for the Feb. 28 primary elections being held in those municipalities.

THEY ALL HAVE mayors or aldermanic posts up for grabs, and those are the few communities that have formal primary elections – even though most of them are dominated by Democratic Party political structure. Most don’t have Republican parties, even in theory.

Meaning that the primary will mean more than the April 5 general election, which will be just a formality for the primary winners to actually begin governing again come May 1.

Most other suburbs have purely nonpartisan political structures, meaning they just have the one election in the springtime during which everything is up for grabs. The majority of voters can be completely oblivious to electoral politics, if they so choose. Although I'd argue they maintain such ignorance at their own risk!

Those of you dedicated enough to cast an early ballot can do so at the voting centers being maintained by the Cook County clerk’s office from now through Feb. 27 – with the usual polling places opening the following day; Election Day itself!

NOT THAT ANY of this means a thing if you’re among the one-third of Chicago-area residents who actually reside in Chicago. For this is the one electoral cycle in which city residents get a break.

Nothing up for grabs, and local government elections not scheduled again until 2019.

  -30-

Wednesday, December 21, 2016

Illinois likely will have to set common standard for all for minimum wage

The Cook County Board a couple of months ago voted to gradually increase the minimum wage for suburban-based companies to pay their employees, hoping in part it could jolt the Illinois General Assembly into taking action.

Yet it seems that all that has been created is a certain level of uncertaintly – that and a sense that Cook County could become a checkerboard, of sorts, of having to keep track which municipalities require their businesses to pay better than others.

FOR WHILE THE county board imposed a standard that will gradually increase the minimum wage in Cook County to $13 per hour by 2020 (similar to the already-enacted Chicago City Council measure that boosts the minimum wage from the current $8.50 by 2019), it would seem there are places that just don’t want to go along.

Earlier this month, city officials in Oak Forest (a southwestern suburb near Orland Park and all those shopping malls) passed a measure opting out of the county-enacted minimum wage requirement.

Local officials weren’t eager to spew all kinds of hostile rhetoric against paying workers a decent wage (although the argument can be made that some types of work aren’t worth as much as others). But their votes to opt-out spoke loud enough.

Although it contrasts with the actions of Calumet City, a suburb that borders up both against Chicago proper and the Illinois/Indiana state line (it also happens to be the community I lived in while growing up).

THERE, CITY OFFICIALS voted to create a referendum question for the April 4 municipal election ballot.

Voters in Calumet City will not only pick a mayor and aldermen (most likely returning long-time officeholder Michelle Markiewicz Qualkinbush as mayor even though state Rep. Thaddeus Jones, D-Calumet City, is contemplating challenging her), they will decide “yes” or “no” on whether the minimum wage ought to go up to $15.

Which, by the way, is the dollar figure that activists across the country are calling for in their own efforts to try to make jobs at Burger King or Wal-mart into something that a person could earn a living at – instead of just taking in some extra money.

The Chicago-based Centro de Trabajadores Unidos issued a statement Tuesday praising the south suburb for taking their action, and even including provisions that the minimum wage would apply to all workers – including those in the restaurant industry.

CONSIDERING THAT I had a mother who, for the bulk of her life worked jobs either as a waitress or cashier (the best job she ever had was her last, as a supermarket cashier because it provided her a health insurance package along with her minimum wage salary), I’m fully aware of how restaurants don’t have to pay their help much.

The argument is made that the waitresses get money in their pockets in the form of tips, which is the reason why I always make sure to leave a respectable gratuity for the people who serve me. And look down on those people who try to claim they’re making a profound statement by not tipping – even though all it really means is they’re cheap!

Now I don’t know how the residents of my former home city will vote on this referendum (or if they’ll be like many other municipality voters and decide this election cycle isn’t worth their time). But I wonder how many people would express some support for this issue – if given the chance to comment.

Because I’m also sure that Oak Forest-expressed attitude, which was largely influenced by the city’s chamber of commerce, is coming from businesses that will view a higher salary as merely a blow to their financial bottom line.

SINCE I’M AWARE of other municipalities that have also considered an opt-out – Elk Grove Village, Barrington, Prospect Heights, Arlington Heights, Barrington Hills, Palatine, Wheeling and Rosemont all either have, or are considering, taking similar actions.

Hence, the checkerboard – as in people who have to rely on such work for anything resembling an income will have to keep track of “good” towns to work in and “bad” ones. While I’m sure some small businesses will insist on locating in the latter to bolster themselves financially without having to invest more in their interests.

Which sounds more like a case for confusion across Cook County – accounting for almost half of Illinois’ population when Chicago proper is included. It really is an issue our state Legislature will have to address.

Except that we have the partisan conditions that prevent our state from even approving itself a proper operating budget and a governor claiming his delay is in the name of economic “reform” – I can already hear his objections to the idea of paying the hired help so much as a dime more in salary and this issue being added to the list of grievances the state has.

  -30-

Monday, September 5, 2016

Labor Day is what we make of it

What should we make of Labor Day? The event that will provoke various celebrations of assorted types that probably say more about our own views than anything about the holiday itself.
RAUNER: Picking a lower-key scene for Labor Day

For the record, Monday is the day in which we will pay tribute to the workers of our society – those people whose labor helps make us the finest place on Planet Earth in which one can live.

OF COURSE, THERE also are those who find the very idea of honoring organized labor to be something subversive. That attitude comes out in the types of celebrations that will be held in various communities.

Take west suburban Naperville, where the parade to be held Monday morning is officially billed as the “Last Fling,” as though the day’s purpose is to have one last celebration before summer comes to an end.

The day is officially being sponsored in that community by a Kia auto dealership and is honoring the local park district as its grand marshal, although among its participants will be Gov. Bruce Rauner – not exactly the kind of politico with any interest in building up a favorable impression among organized labor interests.

The atmosphere in Naperville is likely to be different than what will take place in Calumet City – which usually has an end-of-summer parade that gives a bit of tribute to organized labor.

IT’S NOT THE kind of place that Rauner would choose to be in – likely because he knows the locals would boo and heckle him mercilessly if he were to show his face.

Can Sanguinetti come out on top ...
Which is probably why Lt. Gov. Evelyn Sanguinetti will be the official state participant in that parade – I suspect her presence will be undetected because most of the locals won’t have a clue who she is or what she looks like!

The fact that Southpaw, the fuzzy green mascot of the Chicago White Sox, is also to appear in the Calumet City parade will probably be seen as a bigger deal.

Of course, some people couldn’t wait until Monday to celebrate Labor Day.

... or will Southpaw top her in Calumet City?
TAKE THE PARADE held Saturday along Ewing Avenue in the 10th Ward – where Alderman Susan Sadlowski Garza managed to coordinate the first Labor Day parade held in the far southeast corner of Chicago in the past two decades.

The East Side neighborhood and surrounding communities still have organized labor leanings, even though the number of local residents employed in steel mills or factories isn’t anywhere near as many as it used to be.

It’s more a neighborhood of people who used to be able to live off their brawn, and in many cases complain that they can’t still do so.

Then again, let’s not forget that the last municipal elections saw Garza, a Chicago Teachers Union member, win her election against former Alderman John Pope because of her union ties – which also saw local residents vote strongly in favor of dumping Rahm Emanuel as mayor.

IT’S DEFINITELY THE kind of place that would want to celebrate the concept of organized labor. Which is why they felt compelled to get the jump on celebrating the holiday.
Pullman, the home of Labor Day?

That, and the fact that there is an event scheduled in the nearby 9th Ward, the Pullman neighborhood to be exact, that will take place on Monday. I’m sure that having competing Labor Day celebrations in neighboring wards (literally on opposite sides of Lake Calumet) would have seemed like a bit much.

Where in Pullman, the people like to remember that the remains of the one-time railcar factory was also the scene of a strike that some like to think of as the origins of celebrating Labor Day as an official holiday to begin with.

Unless you think it’s just another excuse to pull out the barbecue grill one more time before the weather goes bad and cook up some burgers; or steaks if you feel like splurging. Or turkey dogs if you’re some sort of health freak!

  -30-

Thursday, September 10, 2015

Yet another Chicago-area political pick, perhaps we should enjoy while we can

Call it one of the intriguing aspects of being a Chicago-area political reporter in the Era of Obama – many of our local officials got roles within the federal government.

GILMORE: Chicago's new U.S. Marshal?
It’s a unique aspect, one that will come to an end once the Obama Years end in January 2017. A new president will have his (or her) own political people to reward.

SO IT WAS within that context that I saw Obama’s nomination this week for the U.S. Marshal to be based in Chicago and oversee northern Illinois.

It’s Edward L. Gilmore, who started out as a police patrolman in Chicago, had a significant career with the Drug Enforcement Agency but for the past seven years has been chief of police in suburban Calumet City.

Which actually happens to be my childhood home city, and also was a city I covered as a reporter for one of my now-former employers. Meaning I actually have had my own dealings with Gilmore – whom I always found to be a unique official within those in law enforcement.

A firm, but soft-spoken temperament. Not as full of as much “law and order” bluster as many cop-types often like to spew.

WHICH MAY HAVE worked to the benefit of Calumet City a few years ago when an autistic teenager was shot to death in his own home by a pair of police officers. The teen was black, and Jesse Jackson was among the activist-types who wound up speaking out.

Black residents (who these days comprise nearly three-quarters of Calumet City’s population) were offended (the cops were white). The incident had all the potential to become a racial hot-spot.

“Calumet City, Ill.,” could easily have become “Ferguson, Mo.” a year or so earlier.

Yet it was the fact that Gilmore didn’t feel the need to get all defensive about his department (an Illinois State Police investigation later found the officers acted in self-defense, making the shooting justified) that likely kept the public from expressing its anger more vociferously.

GAINER: Also ended cop career w/ federal post
I ALSO RECALL the disappearance of a woman (her body turned up in a wooded area near Lowell, Ind., several months later) that had parts of Calumet City all upset. I still recall the way that Gilmore went out of his way to keep the public apprised of the investigation.

To the point where there were certain local residents who were better informed about things than I (a local news reporter) was. Not exactly the usual reaction from a cop to want to clam up about what is happening until they can say a situation is resolved.

Gilmore was the first African-American ever to head the Calumet City police department, and he came along at a time when a former police chief had faced criminal charges (acquitted, but still fired from the post) related to narcotics.

He also came at a time when the population of Calumet City had changed from heavy white ethnic (local historians like to talk about the strong Polish influence that founded the city in the 19th Century) to majority black.

GILMORE’S TEMPERAMENT MAY have been what made the department more accepting. I recall one time when Gilmore walked into a room to overhear some of his officers making racially-tinged jokes – with the chief handling the incident with a quick, but firm, statement making it clear he didn’t approve.

Now, Gilmore moves on. Although he’s not the first local official to become a federal official. One-time Chicago Police official and Illinois State Police Director Terry Gainer went on to become head of the D.C. Capitol police, then sergeant at arms of the U.S. Senate.

OBAMA: How long will appointments last?
He was a George W. Bush-era appointee, but he remained into the Obama years until last year when he finally retired.

Which could be nice if Gilmore were able to remain beyond the term of the president who appointed him. Because the true loss to the public probably would be if Gilmore were to get bounced from the U.S. Marshal post a little over a year from now due to partisan politics.

  -30-

Tuesday, January 28, 2014

Are casino “promises” causing suburbs to hold off on serious development?

Every time I pass the northeast corner of Cicero Avenue and 175th Street in suburban Country Club Hills (I have family that lives nearby), I can’t help but shake my head at the vast expanse of land that exists there.

Will people gamble their way into the red at this site?
That site has a large-scale strip mall that could grow into a shopping mall to its north, and Interstate 80 to the east. It is large enough that local officials say they’re saving it for the casino they want to develop.

THE ONE THAT would be the “south suburban” casino in the grand scheme of things by which Illinois state government ups the number of casinos operating in the state from 10 to 15.

Much of the attention on this issue has gone to the fact that one of the extra casinos would be placed in Chicago, and over whether a Chicago-based casino should be controlled by a city government agency (as in one whose director is picked by Mayor Rahm Emanuel) rather than the Illinois Gaming Board that oversees all other casinos in Illinois.

At times, the idea of a south suburban casino seems like an afterthought.

Yet when I think of the concept, I can’t help but notice the number of communities that are basing their economic future on the idea of something that isn’t currently permitted under state law!

IT MAKES ME wonder how many legitimate development opportunities are being passed on (or not even being contemplated) because everyone is banking their future on the idea of getting a casino.

Made worse by the fact that, at best, ONE community will get the dream. While some half-dozen proposals (at least, more may develop as time passes) are being considered.

There are going to be a lot of losers.

What happens to those communities who, years from now, have nothing to show for their casino dreams other than vacant land plots? Such as that one on Cicero Avenue?

PERSONALLY, I DON’T think much of the whole casino concept. I always thought of them as being for communities that were incapable of getting anything else to locate within their boundaries.

Which makes me wonder if places like Country Club Hills or Homewood (my father and step-mother, who enjoy the casino atmosphere and live just a few minutes from the proposed sites on Cicero Avenue or Halsted Street), or others like Ford Heights, Calumet City or Lynwood (which would like to put a casino right on the Illinois/Indiana border) have any kind of back-up plan?

I have heard from various municipal officials whose complaints about casinos focus on state government for taking so ridiculously long (how many years has it been now?) to make a decision.

Because they feel it puts them on hold. They can’t possibly contemplate real economic development – something that creates jobs better than being a coat-room clerk or a valet parking attendant.

AS FOR THOSE who want to argue the merits of being a black-jack dealer, I don’t really want to hear it. There are higher aspirations in life than dealing cards, and I always wonder about a community that is willing to settle for less.

Because that’s what the whole casino campaign amounts to – communities putting bets on their future in hopes that they’ll strike it rich. When anybody with sense knows that the “house” always wins! As in the casino itself.

Everybody else ultimately comes out the loser. Sometimes, I think these suburban mayors would be better off buying a Mega Millions lottery game ticket.

With all the technicalities and legalese and complications in the process of the state creating a casino, I wonder if the odds are better that they’ll win the big jackpot – as opposed to someday getting a casino.

  -30-

Tuesday, February 26, 2013

An Election Day most of us will ignore

For most of us, Tuesday is nothing but Tuesday.

Even for those of us whose communities have municipal elections (or those of us on the Far South Side) who have a chance to have a do-over election for a member of Congress, it will be thought of as just another Tuesday.

THAT’S BECAUSE WAY too many of us have that bit of Archie Bunker in us – as in actor Carroll O’Connor’s character whose many traits included a reluctance to vote for anything other than president.

Voter turnout for the special election to replace Jesse Jackson, Jr., in Congress is expected to be down.

One such report indicated that of the roughly 250,000 registered voters in the district (which stretches from 53rd Street in Chicago to the Kankakee/Iroquois county line), at most maybe 50,000 of them will actually bother to cast ballots.

Kankakee County officials say they expect about 10 percent of their registered voters to actually bother to turn out at the polling places.

I’M SURE THE weather forecasts calling for a 90 percent chance of rain on Tuesday that turns to snow with temperatures just barely over 30 degrees (which means freezing) will do more than their part to persuade many people who have the chance to cast ballots to think it’s not worth the bother.

This is an odd election cycle.

We have a campaign that is attracting national attention. It involves the replacement of a nationally-known name in Congress. It has gained the attention of New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg – who sees it as a chance to undermine the political influence brandished by the National Rifle Association.

Yet I can’t help but wonder; do Noo Yawkers care more about this campaign than most people here?

THIS ELECTION CYCLE also is odd because we don’t have an Election Day mode going across the Chicago area. Some suburbs have municipal offices up for grabs – but most of those are non-partisan elections taking place come April 9.

As for Tuesday, there are a few towns such as Cicero or Calumet City where there is feisty attempts at campaign activity taking place. But a few stray towns just doesn’t get many people to believe that the future of our Republic is at stake on this day.

As for me, I didn’t cast any ballot for Tuesday. I live just outside of the Illinois Second Congressional District, which means I voted for my member of Congress (Bobby L. Rush) back in November. I don’t have to think about this until next year.

So in Chicago proper, this IS the only election going. Federal and Cook County posts were up for grabs last year, while state government offices will have their day come next year.

AS FOR THE city government positions, we picked Rahm Emanuel to be our mayor two years ago. He and the aldermen will have to regain our support in 2015. So 2013 is the year Chicago voters get a break.

Unless they have to pick from amongst 9th Ward Alderman Anthony Beale, former Congresswoman Debbie Halvorson from Crete, former state Rep. Robin Kelly from Matteson or any of the other minions who comprise the more-than-a-dozen people wishing they could get the Democratic nomination for the post on Capitol Hill.

I’m sure whichever candidate winds up being able to make a “victory” speech Tuesday night will claim to be expressing the “will” of the people. Yet with all the people who likely will sit on their duffs and do nothing, perhaps we ought to consider that the true “will” of the public.

We thought so much of this election that we couldn’t be bothered to vote. Perhaps that’s why we jokingly call it the Election Daze.

  -30-

Thursday, December 13, 2012

What qualifies as holiday “festive,” rather than just downright tacky?

CALUMET CITY, Ill. – It’s that time of the year when some people are going to take offense at holiday displays in public buildings; claiming that somehow our rights to believe what we want are threatened by the presence of a giant Christmas tree.

It might not be politically offensive, but City Hall in Calumet City these days definitely overdoes the holiday spirit. Photographs by Gregory Tejeda

Personally, I think the “threat” to our right to believe what we want is threatened more by the people who try to make an issue out of it.

PARTICULARLY THOSE WHO claim there’s a “War on Christmas.” As though we have to have their vision rammed down our throats for all to be at peace in the world!

But the reality is, I don’t get seriously offended by holiday displays (although I still think all these years later that the people who put up a “Festivus Pole” at the Illinois Statehouse a la Seinfeld had way too much free time on their hands.

What does seriously offend me is when the holiday displays get so overbearing and gaudy that they take what should be a solemn holiday for reflection and turn it into a tacky festival.

If anything, I think many of these public displays for the holiday are offensive – and not just because they were erected just before the Halloween holiday.

IF ANYTHING, I’M nominating my one-time hometown of suburban Calumet City for one of the gaudiest holiday displays in the greater Chicago area. It may be the tackiest, although if anyone out there is aware of something more cheesy, feel free to let me know.
 
Government activity inside not as festive as City Hall entrance

What they do in Calumet City is erect lights all over the City Hall, 204 Pulaski Road, and in the trees of Pulaski Park located just across the streets.

Those lights are on a timer so that at the top of the hour all through the day, a light show is displayed. Lights flash on and off with more synchronization than at the Hoosier-based casinos that exist just a couple of miles away in Hammond, East Chicago and Gary.

Considering that Calumet City is among the municipalities that has made it clear they want the south suburban-based casino that Illinois officials keep hinting will someday be built, perhaps this is just a test run for how flashy a building can be made to look.

BUT IF THE light show isn’t enough, the sound system runs through a string of pop songs that pass for Christmas carols.

Personally, I find the Vince Guaraldi Trio’s “Christmas Time is Here” (you probably think of it as the Peanuts’ cartoon holiday song) soothing the first few times I hear it.

Although passing through the area near City Hall in Calumet City and suddenly being startled by the sound of Andy Williams’ “It’s the Most Wonderful Time of the Year” definitely threw me out of the holiday mood. In fact, that song may now join that holiday ditty with the barking dogs doing Jingle Bells as pop culture dreck that I never want to hear again.
 
Take your pick which holiday tree you want to see lit up

And yes, I’ll concede that I’m not much of a photographer, although these images taken Wednesday night do convey some of the sense of the gaudiness that area residents have to put up with.

BECAUSE THE VOLUME on the music is definitely loud enough to be heard for blocks around – including into Indiana (which admittedly is only two blocks to the east).

How long until the neighbors (there are houses within a block of the building) take up their pitchforks and storm the building – demanding a silence to the holiday-inspired racket?

So if you have a low threshold for holiday kitsch, don’t say I didn’t warn you in saying to stay away from City Hall in Calumet City – where these days municipal officials are going through the process by which they try to knock their political opponents off the ballot for the Feb. 26 municipal elections so they can run unopposed.

Which makes the mood inside the building most definitely un-jolly!

  -30-

Saturday, July 28, 2012

EXTRA: What is this, Miami?!?

Something needs fixing. Photograph by Gregory Tejeda

CALUMET CITY, Ill. – I couldn’t help but get my chuckle for the day while driving Saturday morning through the town in which I grew up.

This Pete’s Fresh Market store was a Dominick’s back in the days when I lived there. It is a nice supermarket, in and of itself, with a particularly nice produce section and ample numbers of foodstuffs for those who are into cooking various ethnic dishes.

BUT THINK ABOUT it. When was the last time we in the Greater Chicago Metropolitan Area had a “January 4” with temperatures anywhere near 73 degrees?

Obviously, there’s a computer glitch of sorts (the real time was somewhere around 10:50 a.m.). Either that, or somebody thinks we live in South Florida these days along with Miami Marlins manager Ozzie Guillen.

Here’s hoping they get their clock fixed soon. Or maybe we should just be thankful they got the temperature right – which means that we got a break Saturday from the maddening heat we have experienced this summer?

  -30-

EDITOR'S NOTE: For what it's worth, a typical January day in Chicago reaches a high temperature of 31 degrees, just barely below the level for freezing water.

Friday, May 14, 2010

We’re split in response to immigration

There’s no doubt about it that we as a nation have a serious split when it comes to the issue of immigration. Then again, we’re split on just about every issue, so why should this be different.

Immigration has shot to the attention spans of many people who previoulsy weren’t paying much attention to the issue, either out of ignorance or indifference. A recent Gallup Organization poll found that 10 percent of the public now believes that “immigration” is the most important problem facing the nation.

WITHIN THE MIDWESTERN U.S., it is not quite as high. Only 8 percent of us think it is the Number One issue. But that compares to just one month ago, when only 1 percent of midwesterners (and 2 percent nationally) would have thought so highly of the issue.

The point is that the issue is on the radar screen of many, including those of us who live along the shores of Lake Michigan. Which means many of us feel the need to “do something” to show our outrage – one way or the other.

Because the responses show just how conflicted we truly are.

Officials from Highland Park High School already are receiving national praise and condemnation for their decision this week to have its girl’s basketball team (which won a conference title for the first time in more than two decades) skip participation in a national tournament.

THAT TOURNAMENT WAS being played in Phoenix, and school officials decided they did not want to send the girls into such an environment as Arizona has become in the weeks since state officials passed a law requiring local police to more vigorously enforce federal immigration laws.

We even got a statement from the school’s assistant principal saying, “we would want to ensure that all of our students had the opportunity to be included and e safe and be able to enjoy the experience. We wouldn’t necessarily be able to guarantee that.” Although we also got former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin using her Rosemont appearance Wednesday to make it clear she did not approve of negativity toward Arizona. This image of the Chicago Skyway may be a half-century old, but it shows clearly just how close parts of Chicago are to Indiana, where officials are threatening to enact their own Arizona-inspired takes in immigration enforcement. Photograph provided by Library of Congress collection.

I will give a little bit of credit to a school district that might easily have been able to think of this issue as something that doesn’t directly affect them. Nobody would have ever expected that school to take any action. The fact that they were willing to make such a statement says something for their character.

Now I know some people are arguing that this amounts to politics interfering with sports. Student-athletes shouldn’t be used to make political statements. They should just play the game, these people will argue.

OF COURSE, THEY’RE arguing that the very fact that the game would get played in such an environment is a political statement in and of itself. Of course, it would be a political statement in favor of Arizona and their policies that are going to turn out hostile toward the Latino population (30 percent of the state, and growing). Which when one considers that Arizona used to be part of the territory that was the New Spain colonies (and later Mexico) seems small.

Not that Highland Park was the only place to make a statement. To the south in Calumet City, the city council there passed a resolution Thursday saying their city officials will not attend conferences in Arizona, nor will they do business with companies that are significantly based in that state.

Admittedly, that particular south suburb does not do much business with Arizona entities. Officials there admit this is more a “symbolic” gesture to show the growing Latino population in that suburb that they have support from their local government officials.

But there are those officials who are trying to claim for Calumet City the status of “First Midwestern Municipality” to pass a resolution criticizing Arizona. I don’t know if that is literally true, because I know the Cook County Board is considering a resolution making a similar statement. There may have even been another town that slipped something past my attention.

BUT I DO know most of the most vocal criticism is coming from the Southwestern U.S., particularly in Los Angeles – where officials earlier this week passed their own resolution that treats Arizona in spirit the same way governments acted in the mid-1980s when many rushed to pass resolutions condemning South Africa and the set of laws known as “apartheid” that made that country’s now-defunct segregation the law of the land.

In fact, all of the states surrounding Arizona are making it clear they do not plan to follow Arizona’s lead on the immigration issue. It seems to be states that are farther away from the issue that most want to let their paranoia run rampant.

In Illinois, Gov. Pat Quinn has said he thinks Arizona was wrong and he would never approve such a measure here. But in neighboring Indiana, a state legislator is threatening to push for such a law in the Hoosier state next year if the federal government does not start behaving in a way he deems appropriate to the issue.

Now why should we care that Indiana wants to impose this type of Arizona-inspired nonsense on themselves? It may be their right to do so.

BUT LET’S NOT forget that Indiana is the one surrounding state that shares a border with Chicago. Down in the land of “Avenue O” and all of the alphabet streets, Indiana is not some abstraction. It is the place with the steel mills lurking in the distance that do their part to pollute the surrounding air. There are Chicagoans to whom Indiana is a daily fact of life. Such a change in law would impact us.

One can literally go to 106th Street and State Line Road, in the shadows of the Chicago Skyway, and look to the east across the street at Indiana. It makes me squirmish to think we could soon have such Arizona acts enforcable so close to our own borders.

This is not an issue for our local government types to enforce (just as immigration laws are not something for local police to be bothered with). The solution to all of this nonsense is going to have to come from Washington, where President Barack Obama gives the issue lip service but has aides who secretly wish they could postpone this battle for a future date.

The problem is that this fight is here now, and must be addressed as promptly as possible. The sooner that federal officials realize that fact, the better off we all will be.

-30-

Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Calumet City & Cicero to have differing Election Day outcomes on Tuesday

In one of the ironies of Campaign ’09, two suburban elections that got mired in the judicial system centered around an identical issue – yet wound up with opposite results.

Calumet City and Cicero both have incumbent mayors who wanted to run unopposed in the primary elections taking place Tuesday. In both cases, the leading opponent was a local police officer who got it into her/his head that they could challenge the incumbent.

IN BOTH CASES, local electoral boards bounced the law enforcement/political wannabes from the primary ballot by claiming that the law prevented police officers from becoming politicians.

In the case of Calumet City, they interpreted state law to say that only firefighters could have political aspirations, while Cicero officials said they had a local law preventing their cops from running for elective office.

Both suburbs wound up spending the bulk of the past couple of months in court, as the politically motivated police officers used the judicial system to try to force local elections officials to print their names on the ballots.

But that is where the similarity ends.

IN CICERO, ROBERTO Garcia got a Cook County judge last week to issue an order saying that the law does NOT prevent police officers from running for office – only from trying to serve as police officers and politicians simultaneously.

But in Calumet City, Pam Cap was not so lucky. Although her name appeared on ballots used at early voting centers across Cook County, an Illinois appellate court ruling last week knocked her off the ballot – and all those people who voted for Cap in early voting have the knowledge that their ballots are now considered spoiled for “mayor.”

Votes cast for Cap don’t count for anything on Tuesday.

Now it struck me as odd (as it did several law enforcement observers) that someone would claim a police officer can’t have political aspirations. After all, one of the long-time veterans of the City Council – Edward Burke – was once a police officer.

AND I CAN remember from my stint covering the Illinois Legislature the era of state Sen. Walter Dudycz, R-Chicago, who was a Chicago cop before going into politics and remained with the Chicago police department (on a permanent leave of absence) even after getting elected.

Those two are just part of a long tradition of police officers who get elected to one office or another.

But the local officials gave their interpretation of the law to apply to their own situations. So what is the difference between west suburban Cicero and south suburban Calumet City that nearly identical (at least from a legal standpoint) cases wound up with opposite results?

In the case of Cicero, a Cook County judge was forced to consider the merits of the legal argument that police should not be politicians. Attorneys for both suburban towns claim that police should have to give up their police positions before running for office – which would leave them with no income while campaigning.

BUT IN CALUMET City’s case, attorneys managed to prevent the issue from ever being considered by a court.

The same Cook County Circuit Court that produced a judge who ruled in favor of Garcia last week wound up having to focus its attention in the Cap case on whether her campaign properly notified local electoral board officials as to her intention to sue the city.

While the Chicago-based law firm of Ancel Glink was prepared to fight the merits of Cap’s case that a cop can be a pol, attorneys hired by Calumet City were able to persuade a Cook County judge that she could not hear the appeal because officials were improperly notified.

And an Illinois appellate panel in Chicago last week, in upholding the Cook County judge’s ruling, specifically said that without strict adherence to procedures in electoral law, no other issues were relevant.

SO IN ONE sense, the attorneys hired by Calumet City (including long-time election law expert Burton S. Odelson) were sharp. They outfoxed the opposition. They did their job. They “won” the case for their client – the government of the City of Calumet City.

The political observer in me almost admires them for skillful use of the law to advance politically partisan motives, which is typical of electoral boards in all towns. Every election cycle produces stories of some government entity where a serious challenger never even got to run for office.

And some people defend such measures these days by reminding us that Barack Obama won his first elective office in the Illinois Senate by getting his opponent, incumbent state Sen. Alice Palmer, D-Chicago, booted from the ballot (for insufficient valid signatures on her nominating petitions). This is an issue where the victors' viewpoint ultimately prevails.

As often came out in the court hearings involved in these two cases, electoral boards historically were supposed to be entities with great authority to make decisions. In fact, the law once said that electoral board rulings about who was, and who was not, on the ballot could not be appealed in any court.

SO PERHAPS IT is not some great legal surprise that Cap will not be on Tuesday’s Democratic primary ballot in Calumet City. Others would say that the only surprise would have been had Garcia failed in his goal to be an alternative to Cicero voters determined to vote against Town President Larry Dominick.

But it strikes me as ironic that Garcia will be able to garner votes for his political aspirations on Tuesday, while Cap has to focus her attention on a write-in campaign (which makes her a political long-shot) in the April 7 general election.

-30-

EDITOR’S NOTES: I get a kick out of reading Cicero President Larry Dominick’s “response” (http://www.suntimes.com/news/elections/1441172,CST-NWS-cicero20.article) to learning that he will have a police officer opponent in Tuesday’s elections.

Calumet City voters will have a “routine” primary election Tuesday as Mayor Michelle Markiewicz Qualkinbush (http://www.nwi.com/articles/2009/02/18/news/illinois/docf01bd73ec936ed778625756100037c12.txt) runs unopposed.

Friday, October 17, 2008

Calumet City willing to resurrect “sin city” image out of financial desperation

I can remember back just over a decade ago when a then-newly elected mayor of south suburban Calumet City decided he wanted to do away with the sinful image his hometown had throughout the Chicago area.

Calumet City was the place with a string of bars and strip clubs located just west of State Line Road, with some of those clubs having direct historic ties to the days of Al Capone. The State Street (not to be confused with Chicago's Great Street) strip was a place that respectable people avoided (and where Gary Dotson got arrested in the 1980s just after being released from prison for a rape conviction-turned-flawed).

THE MAYOR DECIDED his town couldn’t be criticized for promoting sin if there was no sin present. So he literally shut down the bars and had them bulldozed into a large plot of land, claiming he was creating an industrial park to bring significant business to the area’s economy.

Those businesses never came.

The last time I drove through the area, it remained an empty blot that one passed through just before crossing the street into Indiana, where garishly-lit-with-neon stores promoting cheap pop, cigarettes and fireworks beckoned to Illinoisans.

And that mayor is long gone, having run a pitiful attempt to become Illinois treasurer in 1998, then getting himself busted for government corruption and being forced to serve a couple of years in federal prison.

MY POINT IN reciting this quickie moment of Calumet City history is to say that this is not a prissy town. Not now. Not when I lived there some 30 years ago. Not ever.

Although it has turned from a white ethnic place to a majority African-American population, it remains middle-to-low income. It is a place that could use an economic boost, and isn’t particular about where the cash comes from as long as it’s green.

So if anybody thinks that bringing in a few preachers and other moralists to talk of the evils of gambling is going to persuade the local political people from wanting a casino in their town, they must be heavily intoxicated.

For it is true. Calumet City is one of the places that is desperate get the state’s attention to have a casino placed within their boundaries. Current state law permits up to 10 licensed casinos to exist, but there are only nine currently in operation.

UP HEAR O’HARE International Airport, Rosemont is trying again to get that 10th gambling boat license, while other groups also are working with companies that would operate casinos within their towns.

One group that wants to place a casino in the southwest suburb of Stickney literally has hired former Chicago Bears coach Mike Ditka to talk about how “wunnerful” it would be to place the casino down by the Hawthorne Race Course.

Just imagine, playing the ponies and the slots, all in one place. It might actually make you forget for a few seconds that you’re gambling near the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District’s sewage treatment plant that happens to be the largest such facility in the world.

But then, there’s Calumet City, which is trying to spin its proposal in a context of doing the state of Illinois a great service by having a casino within its boundaries.

AS THINGS CURRENTLY stand, many people on the South Side and surrounding suburbs get in their cars and drive east on Interstate 80 or the Chicago Skyway toll road into Indiana when they feel the need to gamble.

Casino boats in Hammond and East Chicago within site (and sometimes smell) of the steel mills and oil refineries draw millions of dollars in tax revenues for their hometowns – money which could have been spent in Illinois if there was a southern Chicago-area gambling site other than the casinos in Joliet.

Calumet City’s officials claim they would literally be able to stop people from venturing to the unsophisticated side of State Line Road, while still allowing them to be able to fulfill their personal need to dump all their money into Illinois-based slot machines or on card games, roulette wheels or whatever particular game of chance is their preference.

Personally, I’m skeptical. And that’s largely because I remember the reason that the 10th riverboat casino that used to exist wound up failing financially.

IT WAS CALLED the Silver Eagle. It was a gambling boat moored in the Mississippi River at East Dubuque, Ill., which means it was located just across the river from Dubuque, Iowa, which had its own casinos.

Now perhaps it is the “American Way” that the people choose which businesses they want to patronize, and those that do not appeal to the public go broke. That’s what happened to the Silver Eagle, which was consistently the Illinois gambling boat with the lowest gross income when it existed in the 1990s.

It had a lot to do with the rules under which Illinois casino boats operated. At the time, they had to offer cruises of the river, while Iowa’s boats remained in dock all the time. Illinois’ boats were under the pretense of being cruises where some gambling took place. Iowa just came out and admitted that the boats were places where no one should be shocked to find gambling taking place.

People who derive pleasure from visiting casinos chose to gamble in Iowa, even those who lived in Illinois. It is this same reason that the gambling boat in Rock Island always has faced stiff competition from gambling operations in Iowa, and where the Casino Queen of East St. Louis has to ensure it does not fall behind gambling in Missouri.

MY POINT IS to say that it is likely the hard-core gamblers who don’t care about any of the frills and just want to live out a dream that someday, they’ll hit a huge score will go to the casino that puts up the least resistance. Illinois laws regarding casinos are meant to put up resistance.

I suspect that makes the Hammond and East Chicago sites of more appeal than any gambling boat in Calumet City would ever be. I’ve already heard some people point out that a casino in Illinois would have to comply with the public smoking restrictions that do not exist in Indiana.

Would a Calumet City casino become the place where people snicker for a second before crossing over the state line on their way to East Chicago or Hammond? It wouldn’t surprise me in the least.

And it also wouldn’t shock me to learn that a Calumet City casino could suffer the same fate as the Silver Eagle.

BESIDES, THERE’S ONE other point. The same people who desperately wanted a casino to be built in Rosemont (near O’Hare and hotels where tourists stay) will make the same argument now that a casino meant to take people’s money should be built in a place convenient to where those people actually are.

So if I had to bet money, I’d place it on Rosemont. Who’s to say how the local politicos there will be able to influence their state counterparts to see the benefit of bright, shiny lights from a casino helping to guide planes into O’Hare, then guide those passengers to the slots – where they can go for broke.

Maybe they’ll even figure out a way for people merely making a connection at O’Hare and waiting for another flight to make a quick trip to the casino.

Isn’t that a pleasant memory for people to take from Chicago?

-30-

EDITOR’S NOTES: Proponents of putting a casino in Calumet City, Ill., think they can (http://www.nwi.com/articles/2008/10/15/news/top_news/doc59c4d27f2627279d862574e3000103f7.txt) stop Chicago-area people from traveling east to Indiana to gamble at casinos in Hammond and East Chicago.

Seven companies are submitting bids to the Illinois Gaming Board seeking to control the last license currently available to (http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-casino_bidsoct16,0,3058513.story) operate a gambling boat in this state.

Mike Ditka likes to gamble. Or at least he likes to take the money of casino operators in (http://www.nwi.com/articles/2008/10/15/columnists/offbeat/docceed86643f6534d6862574e200694b4c.txt) order to promote their facilities.

How many towns openly include the name “Al Capone” among a list of prominent people (http://www.calumetcity.org/history.html) who helped shape their municipal character? How many towns think a name change will significantly alter their (http://www.encyclopedia.chicagohistory.org/pages/204.html) character?

Wednesday, February 6, 2008

"Eerie address" duo is now a trio

TINLEY PARK, Ill. – I took my first trip Tuesday out to the Brookside Marketplace shopping center and it hit me while driving through the center’s enormous parking lots – I now have another “eerie address” to add to my life story.

For those of you living in a cave these past four days, the shopping center was the site of a mass shooting at a Lane Bryant store that resulted in five women killed, and a sixth injured and being kept in protective custody – just on the off chance that someone might want her “taken out” to eliminate a quintuple murder witness.

“Eerie addresses” are what I call sites of vicious crimes that are in areas connected to my life. They are places I have passed many dozens, if not hundreds, of times in my life. No physical evidence remains of what happened there. But in my mind, the crime is on an endless loop.

BROOKSIDE MARKETPLACE IS a still-under-construction shopping center in the southwest suburb that has grown so much in the past decade that it has spilled over from Cook into Will county, including the mall.

Cook County Sheriff Tom Dart probably breathed a sigh of relief that this crime did not happen on his territory. Literally, though, had it happened on the east side of Harlem Avenue, or just to the north of the shopping center, it would have been a Cook County crime.
This aerial shot shows the proximity of the Brookside Marketplace (the red mark) to Interstate 80 and Harlem Avenue. The suspected gunman -- who remained at-large late Tuesday -- likely had no problem quickly escaping the Chicago area and spending Saturday night in Toledo, Ohio or Des Moines, Iowa, or anywhere else in the United States. Illustration provided by Yahoo Maps.

How does this affect me?

My mother lives in Tinley Park, just off of Harlem. She is exactly 20 blocks from the shopping center, and there have been times that I have taken her shopping there because it is only a five-minute drive (at most) from where she lives. There also have been times when my brother and I did Christmas shopping there.

I HAVE NEVER been in the particular Lane Bryant store where the Saturday shootings took place. But I knew exactly where it was, sitting all by its lonesome on the east edge of the shopping center. Most of the big stores, such as a Super Target and a newly-opened Kohl’s Department Store are on the west end.

In fact, I was physically in Tinley Park on Saturday at the time the shooting took place. I was spending time with my mother when I learned of the incident, and I saw some of the paranoia that overtook local residents.

A police officer literally parked his car at the west end of my mother’s block (the point where her street intersected with Harlem Avenue) and was giving a cursory check to everybody who tried to drive down the street.

I didn’t get harassed too much (maybe I just had an innocent look about me that day). But I heard the helicopters repeatedly flying overhead, as local officials were hopeful they might see something from above that would tip them off to the gunmen.

SHOPPING THERE WAS already a strange experience because the center (which has repeatedly been referred to in news coverage as a strip mall, but is way larger than the usual convenience and video store combinations that usually comprise mini-malls) is still under construction.

The Target has been up and running for about two years, but the Kohls and a Best Buy opened just a few months ago, and some stores are still being built.

Instead of being able to look forward to the day when the store is a fully-mature shopping experience, Brookside Marketplace will now always have an aura of creepiness to it, unless the mall’s owners are willing to adopt a go-with-the-flow attitude and allow the true-crime gawkers to take over the place.

So the 19000 block of Harlem Avenue in Tinley Park goes into my “eerie address” book, along with the 2300 east block of 100th Street in Chicago, and the 300 block of Yates Avenue in Calumet City.

THE FORMER WAS the site of one of the most notorious (and attention-grabbing) crimes in Chicago history when, in 1966, a merchant marine from Dallas named Richard Speck broke into a townhouse where nine student nurses at nearby South Chicago Community Hospital were living.

Eight of them were killed (one was brutally raped), and the only reason the ninth was able to survive was that she had the sense to hide under a bed. Speck, who apparently lost count of the women, left without doing anything to her.

Both sides of my family come from the South Chicago neighborhood. My parents were raised there and I was born there. I still have some relatives who live there.

There was once a time when going to grandma’s house meant driving along 100th street and passing “the Speck house.” It was a building whose sight I never will forget, along with the public park that was across the street.

I REMEMBER WHEN I first dug up the newspaper clippings about the crime as part of research for a school project (I was not quite one year old when the crime happened), what caught my attention was the note that police interviewed people in that park. In fact, had Cora Amurao not had the sense to hide under the bed, Speck likely would have gotten away with his crime – instead of spending the rest of his life in prison as the star of bootleg pornographic films.

Every time I drove by the eerie address after that, I could picture in my mind the police becoming extremely frustrated by their efforts because, “nobody saw nothin’.”

Even though the structure itself has since been torn down, I still know where it stood, and can picture it in my mind’s eye – even without driving east on 103rd street.

Then, there is Yates Avenue. I lived there when I was in high school, and my mother lived there for several more years before finally moving further away from Chicago proper.

I LIVED IN the middle of the block, and my mind can still picture the apartment building on the corner where on a late night in December 1987, the Calumet City police made Barney Fife look like a professional lawman.

On that night, a man who was seriously wasted on drugs (the kind that gave him way too much nervous energy, rather than put him to sleep) broke into an apartment unit, deciding he needed to have sexual contact with someone.

The woman who lived there ran out of the apartment screaming, and a neighbor called police. The woman’s 12-year-old daughter wound up suffering the brunt of the man’s sexual anger.

When police arrived, they had the mother telling them what was happening inside. They could hear screams from inside the building. Yet two rounds of police officers were hesitant to break in, out of fear they would be accused of over-reacting to the situation.

IT WASN’T UNTIL a third round of officers arrived at the scene that police entered the apartment, where they eventually had to use their clubs to beat the man off the girl.

I learned most of this detail two years later when the man was on trial in Cook County court in Markham. I was a reporter for the now-defunct City News Bureau of Chicago at the time, and I covered the trial for the wire service.

At the time, my mother still lived on Yates Avenue. It creeped me out more than any other story I ever wrote about (and I was a reporter walking the streets of Winnetka trying to get information the day in 1988 that Laurie Dann broke into an elementary school with a pistol and began shooting students and a teacher, before finally shooting herself) because of its proximity.

But I can’t say I’m going to be packing up my mother’s belongings and moving her away from Brookside Marketplace. One of the things I learned from being a reporter is that there really are no safe places.

PEOPLE LIKE TO think they can find a neighborhood in Chicago or community elsewhere that is so secluded that no one can ever reach out to hurt them. Such places do not exist.

Something even happened when I lived in Springfield, Ill. One of my neighbors in the apartment complex where I lived became so enraged when he learned his wife was planning a trip to Las Vegas with another man that he went and got his gun, then refused to let her go.

The “hostage situation” in my apartment lasted about four hours, and I had to stand around outside waiting for police to let me back into my unit.

BUT THE 700 block of Bruns lane in Springfield doesn’t count as an “eerie address” for me because there were some tawdry details that made the story more pathetic, than chilling. Plus, no one got shot.

The bottom line is that bad things can happen anywhere. They are not restricted to the Englewood neighborhood, or some other place where “bad” people live (‘bad’ in this instance meaning, ‘not like me’).

They even happen in “extremely ordinary and dull” places like the Chicago suburbs.

-30-

EDITOR’S NOTES: Focusing attention on Tinley Park in the search for a gunman like local police are doing (http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/776717,CST-NWS-shoot05.article) could be a mistake. Brookside Marketplace is located on Harlem Avenue literally where the street intersects with Interstate 80.

Tinley Park Mayor Ed Zabrocki tries to calm the population (http://www.tinleypark.org/) of his village by telling them the obvious; evil can happen anywhere. But it is interesting to know that flags in the suburban village will remain at half-staff until Friday as a tribute to the dead.

For those of you who enjoy reading law enforcement attempts at writing in legalese, here (http://www.tinleyparkpolice.org/pdf/Lane%20Bryant%20update.pdf) is the latest update on the quintuple murders issued by the Tinley Park police department.