Soon to be Wells and Wells? Or Ida and Wells? |
For
that strip of a few blocks of street at the southern edge of the Loop will now
bear the name of Ida B. Wells, the one-time activist whose cause was to make
people think of lynching as a crime – rather than justice being carried out.
BUT
JUST AS some people got all worked up and fought it out when plans to turn
Balbo Drive into Wells Parkway were proposed (seeing it as a slur against people
of Italian ethnic origins), I’m sure even this attempt at political compromise
can cause a brawl.
For
Chicago already has a Wells Street, and it intersects with the soon-to-be
former Congress Parkway. Meaning we will soon have an intersection of Wells and
Wells. And I don't mean one of those brown "honorary" street designations. I'm talking about a full-on renaming; green street sign and all!
Mass
confusion? I’d hope not! Even though one alderman has suggested we ought to
refer to the former Congress Parkway as “Ida Drive” to eliminate all doubt.
Personally,
I’d like to think the people of Chicago are intelligent enough to be able to
tell the difference between a north/south running street and an east/west
running one – particularly since the latter will only exist for a few blocks. Besides,
I also think it will be an interesting quirk to have the Wells and Wells
intersection. It will be something that the kind of Chicagoans who take great
interest in the city’s historical oddities will take great pride in.
IDA B.: Anti-lynching activist, suffragette |
WE’LL
ENJOY THE confused look that out-of-towners will get on their faces at the very
concept that two intersecting streets can have similar names. We’ll even start
using it as a test, of sorts, to be able to figure out who is a real Chicagoan –
and who is just a pretender from a place like Schaumburg.
Maybe
we can even argue it out over which Wells has greater merits to have a street
named for them. For Ida B. is the woman who was a reporter-type person back in
the days when black women were supposed to be nothing more than domestics.
While
William Wells was a U.S. Army captain assigned to the early 19th
Century military base Fort Dearborn (where Michigan Avenue and the Chicago
River now intersect) and who died in the Aug. 15, 1812 fight with Potawatomi
Indians.
WILLIAM: Indian fighter in pre-Chicago days |
You
just know it’s a matter of time before someone suggests that William is
unworthy (in today’s day and age) of having his name at the same intersection as
Ida B.
ALTHOUGH
IT SHOULD be noted he was of the Miami Indian tribe and fought with them during
the Indian wars, before eventually becoming an Indian agent with the developing
United States. Meaning this could become a brawl with American Indian activists
if anyone seriously tried to remove the “Wells” name from Wells Street.
All
the more reason the idea of a Wells and Wells intersection would work in
Chicago – because it would (unintentionally) wind up showing the way so many
groups have combined into the one entity we now know of as the Second City (which
is really third and may someday soon become Number Four).
Of
course, we could always think that streets being named for people creates too
much cause for conflict and offense to be taken by somebody. Which is why a
part of me always thought the South Side bore the most sense in Chicago, with
all the streets from downtown all the way south to the Hegewisch neighborhood
bearing numbers.
Is
anyone up for renaming Wells Street “Fifth Avenue” – the name it had between
1870 and 1912 because some thought William’s reputation would be besmirched by
having his name on a street that was, at the time, the city’s “red light”
district.
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment