Will it be Rauner who fades into obscurity ... |
Yet
as far as who’s going to prevail come the March 20 primary, along with the
general election come Nov. 6? That’s a crapshoot. I’m sure everybody amongst
the occupants of political geekdom is convinced their side will prevail.
BECAUSE
HOW COULD anybody with any common sense possibly side with the opposition? Are
they mad!!!
... or will Pritzker wind up ultimate '18 failure |
There
are those who are convinced that the public’s regard for Donald Trump is so low
that they will cast their ballots in ways meant to take out their hostility for
the president on anybody perceived to be his ally.
Then
again, the people who were inclined to support Trump back when he won the presidency
in 2016 are most likely enjoying the fact that the people who oppose Trump are
so infuriated by his presence. That thought may motivate them to turn out in
great numbers to vote so as to ensure the Trump critics don’t make any political
gains.
For
the record, the Gallup Organization had Trump at a 40 percent approval rating
as of Sunday – which is fairly stable for him. A solid majority of our society
(or at least those who were actually contacted by Gallup) does not think much
of this Age of Trump in which our society is now engaged.
Trump enjoys thought '18 will be all about him |
WHICH
MAY BE why Gov. Bruce Rauner is engaged in a battle royale for his own
political fate – he desperately wants to distance himself from Trump’s most
nonsensical acts.
Yet
the fact that he won’t develop a tight bond with the president is considered
one of the reasons why the conservative element of Illinois’ population is
speaking out against him, and why the Republican primary campaign of Jeanne Ives
isn’t being totally dismissed.
Could
Rauner wind up being the equivalent of Dan Walker – that 1970’s era governor
who in 1976 couldn’t even win his party’s nomination for re-election? Yes, then-Mayor
Richard J. Daley despised Walker to the point where he backed -then Secretary of
State Michael J. Howlett against him.
One
lesson to Republican partisans who are inclined to back Ives/dump Rauner (however
they choose to view it); the split amongst Democrats that year resulted in
James R. Thompson winning the general election – and was the beginning of a 26-year
run of Republican governors.
Will Rauner be compared to '76 Walker? |
WHICH
MEANS THE GOP may be wary of provoking a similar streak against themselves and
may wind up holding their noses in voting for Bruce.
What
actually makes me not totally disregard the chances of a second term of “Gov.
Rauner” is the fact that I question the Democratic candidates. Thus far, it
seems J.B, Pritzker of the incredibly-wealthy and politically-connected
Pritzker family is the favorite to win the nomination come March.
But
I don’t get any sense that his candidacy is beloved by anybody. It seems more a
matter of people accepting the inevitability of a Pritzker win, rather than
thinking he has any ideas that capture their fancy.
This
could really wind up being the year that two self-funding billionaires blow
their family fortunes to win election to a post that pays a salary of just over
$177,000 – along with access to a mansion in Springfield that (by all accounts)
is in serious need of repair.
IT
MAY WIND up being that whichever candidate winds up taking the oath of office
as Illinois governor come January 2019 will be taking on a massive headache,
with the financial compensation hardly seeming worth the hassle.
Then
again, it’s all about the ego for some people. Perhaps it is rewarding, in and
of itself, to be able to walk around calling oneself “governor” and
occasionally have commentaries written about speculation that you could someday
become president.
Once Rauner/Pritzker is history, it'll be all about Rahm |
Then
again, it’s not like Trump ever went through the hassle of running for a government
post to gain experience for a presidential run – and an experience that likely
has three years remaining.
2018
has arrived, and about the only thing we can say for certain is that a year
from now, either Pritzker or Rauner will be history. That, and we’ll be asked
almost immediately whether we want Rahm Emanuel for a third term as the city’s “Man
on Five.”
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment