It amounts to more cheap rhetoric about the issue, particularly when it relates to people who were brought as children by their parents to this country without all the valid papers being lined up.
WHAT
WE HAVE is many thousands of people living in this country who, for all
practical purposes, are assimilated into our society. But the paperwork glitch
makes it impossible for them to fully enjoy the benefits of living in this
country.
Former
President Barack Obama tried to address this issue with Deferred Action for
Childhood Arrivals – a program by which those young people registered with the
government and were given permits allowing them to work, while also being
spared the threat of deportation. Some 700,000 young people took advantage.
It
was a step in the right direction (allowing them to work toward naturalization
and gain citizenship would complete the process). But of course, to the mindset
of people in this Age of Trump we’re now in, it has to be undone. Just as
everything Obama became involved with now has to be eradicated from our
society.
Trump
abolished DACA last year, but said he’d give Congress until March to come up
with a long-range solution to the larger problem. Although U.S. District Judge William Alsup late Tuesday ruled against Trump's March deadline -- creating the possibility the issue could drag on longer.
WHICH IS VERY likely, considering that we're talking about the same Congress that has been so inept throughout
the years that it can’t come close to finding a solution to eliminating the
bureaucratic glitches that exist in our national immigration policy.
So
the idea that anything would happen was always laughable – particularly since
many of those people most pleased by Trump’s presence in the White House are of
a belief that the only real solution is mass deportations. Eliminating all
those damn foreigners is what they mean by the insipidness of Trump’s “Make
America Great Again” campaign slogan.
Trump
on Tuesday met with members of Congress, of both major political persuasions,
supposedly to try to come up with a solution to nudge Congress off their
collective derriere to do something.
That’s
where he came up with his “bill of love” rhetoric, which he says would be a
two-phase plan for immigration reform, albeit one that strikes me as being more
inaction than anything else.
TRUMP’S
FIRST PHASE involves taking action to move forward on the president’s
long-desired talk of a full-scale wall along the U.S./Mexico border. He’s
determined to have something built along those 1,900 miles in the southwestern
U.S. – regardless of how impractical, stupid or irrelevant such a barricade
would prove to be in deterring entry into this country by people considered
less-than-desirable by racially-motivated ideologues.
The
second phase would then give Congress the “green light,” so to speak, to try to
figure out a comprehensive immigration reform plan that would resolve the
problem, once and for all.
But
like I wrote earlier, Congress has tried for decades to come up with real
reform – only to be thwarted by the element that likes the bureaucratic mess we
have now because it complicates conditions for people wishing to come to this
country.
Basically,
Trump’s talk on Tuesday amounted to “gimme da wall,” then do nothing more.
Which doesn’t fix a thing.
I
FOUND IT particularly laughable to learn that Trump talked of restoring
“earmarks” to the budget process so as to encourage members of Congress to act.
Earmarks are the process by which Congressmen can get federal funds for pet
projects in their home districts.
Meaning
we use federal funds to buy off the Congress, with no guarantee they’d follow
through with immigration reform.
It
may actually be more evidence that Trump is a rank amateur when it comes to
politics – spewing out such nonsensical talk in hopes that he can get that
pointless wall built.
Although
considering Trump was a real estate guy who has had several structures bearing
his name built all over the world, I’d insist that if this wall ever does get
erected, it too should carry his identity. “Trump, the Border Wall!” is all about
his warped sensibilities, rather than anything representing American ideals.
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment