SOLIS: Cooperating to cover own tracks |
Burke,
of course, is the half-a-century member of the City Council who now is the target
of federal investigators who are digging into all sorts of political
corruption. It seems much of the evidence they’ve accumulated against Burke comes
from Solis.
IN
THE FORM of Solis wearing wiretaps for the FBI so that he could get close to Burke
and allow “G-men” to catch him on tape in the act of saying something
self-incriminating.
Reports
of Solis engaging in such activity with the FBI (as part of a deal by which
they’ll agree to lesser criminal charges for things that Danny has done) came
out this past week, and the reaction of many aldermen was shock, if not outright
contempt, that one of their own would try to cover up his behind at the expense
of a council colleague.
I’ve
seen a lot of people quoting the ideals of organized crime, as expressed in
films such as “Goodfellas” or “The Godfather” – the ideal of omerta and keeping silent about what one
really knows.
Which
to my mindset almost sounds like the real comparison ought to be to street gang
culture and the idea of “don’t snitch,” particularly to law enforcement.
ALL
OF WHICH means I can easily envision people wanting to think of Danny Solis or
anybody like him as somehow worthy of retribution. How can “we” act in a way to
make it up to Ed Burke?
Which
makes me wonder if Solis’ Mexican-American ethnic origins will wind up coming
into factor. Because Burke is the guy who’s facing all these allegations of his
own alleged corrupt behavior at a time when he’s facing a re-election
challenge.
With
his challengers being people of Mexican ethnic origins themselves who are
basing their campaigns against Burke on the idea that it’s time to dump the
Irish guy whose ward is now an overwhelming (nearly 80 percent) Latino majority
population.
BURKE: Could he become sympathetic figure? |
I
have no doubt that the non-Latino voters in that district will be motivated by
the idea of keeping things the way they are. Will there also now be added an
angry overtone of turning out in force on Election Day to keep those Latino
voters from gaining any influence?
IT’S
A STUPID, shallow and completely superficial line of logic. But it’s also
something that would totally be in character with Chicago’s neighborhood
mindset.
A Latino like Solis gets fingered as
a significant part of FBI investigators and their case against the all-powerful,
long-time alderman who had the influence to tell mayors what they ought to do
within city government.
So now, the voters will think it
somehow just to take it out on the three aldermanic candidates of Latino
origins themselves who (as they probably see it) have the nerve to think they
can run against Burke for his City Council post.
Combine it with the mindset of
those such as the Fraternal Order of Police, which recently voted to endorse
Burke’s re-election bid in the Feb. 26 municipal elections, and the significant
campaign stash that Burke has accumulated for his own benefit – and I can
easily see how Burke’s legal predicament can be overcome.
THAT IS, FOR now. Because it’s very
likely that any effort to get an indictment against Burke with criminal charges
more serious than the current allegations that he tried to shake down a Burger
King franchise owner in his neighborhood will come up following the election
process.
Burke could easily get re-elected,
then indicted, before we reach the peak of the baseball season this summer.
It’s more likely that ethnicity
will somehow benefit Burke in the short-term – and that fact could wind up being
most embarrassing to Chicago.
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment