STAVA-MURRAY: A freshman playing like powerhouse |
What
sticks in my mind about this interview was now unproductive it was. She wasn’t
able to say much, ultimately explaining her ignorance on the issue by saying, “I’m
a freshman” and that leadership hadn’t kept her fully appraised of this
particular issue.
I
COULDN’T HELP but think back to Kaszak when I heard this week about Anne Stava-Murray
– a newly-elected Illinois House member from suburban Naperville. She hasn’t
even taken office yet, but already has declared her political intentions for the
2020 election cycle.
She’s
am ambitious sort, I’ll give her that. She’s going to run for the U.S. Senate
seat from Illinois that will be open next year. That, of course, is the seat currently
held (and has been since 1996) by Richard Durbin.
Of
course, the presumption is that Durbin will be seeking re-election. If he were
going to try moving to another political post, the obvious shift would be to
try becoming Illinois’ governor.
DURBIN: Does he have credible opponent? |
THE
LONG-AGO Republican from Pekin who became among the GOP elder statemen with a
reputation for being willing to work in a bipartisan political manner. A legend,
of sorts, in the halls of Capitol Hill.
Except
to people like Stava-Murray, who claims that if Durbin were serious, he’d have
already formally declared his candidacy. Although I suspect he already has the
beginnings of a re-election bid up and running in a low-key manner.
MADIGAN: Her 'real' opponent? |
It
will help her erase the stink of being just a freshman representative in the
Illinois House – one that she was definitely going to face because she has
openly talked of the need to dump long-time (a full half-century) Illinois
House Speaker Michael Madigan, D-Chicago, from his political post.
SHE
WAS IN full agreement with those Republican ideologues who tried running campaigns
last year on the grounds that we need to “Dump Madigan!” and she publicly
refused to take the aid that Madigan usually provides to Democrats to support
his own Illinois House majority.
It’s
not likely she’d have a lengthy future as a representative, since I don’t doubt
the Madigan operation is already seeking someone more politically sympathetic
to “Mr. Speaker” to challenge Stava-Murray come 2020.
DIRKSEN: Most definitely of the past |
But
by doing this, she’ll shift the story from her being a renegade legislator to
her being one of Illinois’ top politicos (along with Sen. Tammy Duckworth,
Gov.-elect Pritzker and whichever of the assorted characters manages to win the
mayoral elections to be held next month and in April).
I
don’t doubt that Democratic operatives will go out of their way to undermine
Stava-Murray and try to ensure she returns to being a political nobody after
next year.
BUT
I HAVE to wonder what goes through her mindset – if she really thinks she’s the
beneficiary of a revolutionary “movement” against Madigan, instead of someone
who won because of the intense level of contempt many of us feel for Donald Trump!
TRUMP: His critics led Stava-Murray to win |
To
me, the explanation is that she’s from Naperville – which once was a part of
the great DuPage County Republican organization that was among the strengths of
the GOP nationwide.
There
once would have been a time when Stava-Murray would have been a Republican
aspirant for political office – except that the Republicans have gone so far overboard
to become the political party of rural America that I suspect if she had tried
to run in the Republican primary last year, she’d have lost. They wouldn't want her. She's a Democrat by default!
It
may well be that Stava-Murray is showing off her political ignorance and doesn’t
fully realize “which side” she’s on. For her sake, she’s going to have to figure
things out and “pick a side,” or else it could turn into a bloody two years for
her.
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment