Workload not as violent, but it doesn't feel easier |
Yet
let’s be honest; I have no doubt that the instant another incident occurs that
we’ll get another diatribe from Donald Trump and his ilk about just how
god-awfully violent the Second City is.
AS
THOUGH THE key to our improvement is to replace our elected officials with
people inclined to sympathize with this Age of Trump we now live in. Allowing
ourselves to be perceived as “blue” and the reason why Illinois is so intensely
hostile toward Republican interests is the real reason for the diatribes.
For
I doubt the people who make such absurd statements really care about the conditions
in Chicago. It’s just another partisan piece of rhetoric they can use against
the political opposition.
I
doubt they care in the least about the people who actually have to suffer in
the parts of Chicago that provide the bulk of the incidents that comprise most
of the city’s homicide rate. If anything, I wouldn’t be surprised to learn that
the ideologues who most complain about the city’s statistics related to
violence think the people who are the brunt of the incidents are to blame for
their own circumstances.
That’s
the reason why I have such hostile reactions toward anybody who tries to make
an issue of the homicide total – which in coming days is going to get another update.
FOR
WE’RE IN a New Year. As of Friday (Dec. 28), there had been 570 people killed
by the deliberate actions of another human being (which is the very definition
of ‘homicide’). When one adds in the weekend running through incidents as late
as midnight Monday, that’s bound to increase a bit.
But
it would take a total bloodbath for the death tally for Chicago to exceed the
675 of 2017, which itself was lower than 2016 – which is starting to appear
more and more like some sort of statistical fluke.
Rather
than a return to the days of the late 1980s into the early 1990s, when it was
typical for there to be between 900 and 1,000 homicides per year – which means
the recent spurt isn’t even close to what this city used to experience.
I’ll
be honest and admit that era sticks in my mind particularly harshly; largely because
that’s back in the day when I worked for the now-defunct City News Bureau of Chicago
and the daily activity of the Chicago Police was on the forefront of my mind.
BUT
EVEN THEN, the bulk of violent crime in Chicago was contained to certain
neighborhoods. There were parts of Chicago where a single violent death would
be considered a major headline, while other parts of Chicago would have so many
incidents that most of them were never covered beyond anybody but a “City News”
kid reporter.
The
sad part of this story is that, according to a Chicago Tribune report on
Monday, it appears the leading police districts for violent crime will be Harrison
on the West Side and Englewood on the South.
Which,
to be honest, were the leaders for violent crime back in my own police
reporting days.
It’s
as though nothing has changed, and certain parts of Chicago continue to get the
brunt of everything that is wrong with the city – while other parts manage to benefit
from the city’s improvements of recent decades.
WHICH
IS WHAT I’m sure the ideologues will complain is some form of hypocrisy on the
part of Chicagoans – talking up our strengths while ignoring those of us who
don’t fall into certain demographics.
TRUMP: Numbers won't matter, he'll complain! |
As
in they’re merely interested in using a high homicide tally to tag the rest of
us with a dirty brush. And as for the people who will suffer, I can’t help but think
of those who (invariably) will perish in the early hours of Tuesday – starting off
a new year with the same ol’ nonsense,
You
just know someone will be hit by stray shrapnel from a nitwit who thinks the
way to kick of 2019 is to fire off a weapon into the air; hitting an unintended
target several blocks away.
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment