STAVA-MURRAY: Serious study, or self-attention? |
True
enough, Stava-Murray earlier this year used that label to refer to her DuPage
County municipality (the fourth-largest city in Illinois) while responding to a
Facebook post where somebody had described Naperville government as “the
biggest bullies.”
TO
ME, THE white supremacist label carries such a strong overtone that I wonder if
it is too strong a label to use; one that distorts the reality of the
situation.
Then
again, there’s no disputing that Naperville is NOT a community where there are
great numbers of African-American individuals living. For what it’s worth, an
American Community Survey completed in 2016 showed more than three-quarters of
the Naperville population being white – with people of Asian or Latino ethnic
origins also existing in greater numbers than the 4.7 percent of those who are
black.
Stava-Murray
points out that many of the local public schools have next to no black
students, and absolutely no black teachers.
Which
might seem to be dooming any effort to get re-elected to her post come the 2020
election cycle. Then again, Stava-Murray (who has just begun her first term in
office this month after being elected back in November) has already hinted
she’s going to challenge Sen. Richard Durbin, D-Ill., come the next elections.
COULD
IT BE that Stava-Murray has already realized her ’18 election as a Democrat to
represent a DuPage County district that historically has been Republican was a
pure fluke? And that making such comments is meant to try to give her more
appeal to those parts of Chicago where non-white voters are predominant?
I
could see where many of those voters might think some white lady from
Naperville wouldn’t know anything about them. Is this an attempt by her to show
that she’s not totally clueless?
It
had better work out that way. Because if it doesn’t, I could see where making
such comments becomes a political “kiss of death” to any future she thinks she
might have.
What should we think of Naperville community character? |
THEN
AGAIN, PERSPECTIVE on what constitutes “diversity” varies based on whom one is
talking to.
I
remember once covering a legislative hearing about redistricting and district
boundaries where local officials from suburban Tinley Park described their
hometown as a diverse community – largely because the white majorities also had
significant numbers of people of Arab ethnic origins moving in, along with a
growing number of Latinos.
The
African-American legislators on that committee took offense to the “diverse”
label being applied to the municipality, which had a black population of less
than 2 percent.
They
couldn’t comprehend use of the “diversity” label to a community where their
numbers were so few. Still are actually, as the 2010 Census Bureau count showed
Tinley with a 1.92 percent black population – and with the majority including American
Indian, Asian, Pacific Islander and Latino, along with its white populace
including significant tallies of people of Irish, German, Polish, Italian and Dutch
ethnic origins.
THE
POINT BEING that the “diverse” label being applied, or denied, to a community
probably says more about the hang-ups of the person using the label – rather than
the reality of the communities in question.
DURBIN: Stava-Murray likely opponent in 2020 |
For
what it’s worth, I have a step-brother who lives out in that area, and a niece
who attends high school within the Naperville district (which actually includes
her home in neighboring Aurora).
While
I’m not going to claim the area is most accepting to the presence of black
people, it is far in character from the communities I have been in that truly do
reflect a “white supremacist” attitude.
That
goes even further in thinking that Stava-Murray’s use of the “white supremacist”
label is most likely a campaign tactic; trying to build an image for the
currently little-known legislator as she prepares for future runs for political
office. Which also means we’re likely to hear similar trash talk during the next
two years.
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment