VAN DYKE: His life's on trial |
He
gave the one-time World’s Greatest Newspaper an interview, and the competition
Chicago Sun-Times felt compelled to do a quickie rewrite. Many broadcast
outlets also are feeling compelled to acknowledge Van Dyke’s thoughts.
SO
WHAT SHOULD we think of the officer who admits he shot and killed Laquan
McDonald back in October of 2014? It certainly isn’t his claim that he faces
the possibility of life imprisonment for doing his sworn duties as a Chicago
police officer.
What
caught my attention was Van Dyke’s statement, during a 40-minute interview with
the newspaper where his attorneys often interceded and kept him from more
thoroughly answering questions, that he acknowledges the potential consequences
to the city at-large.
Could
there wind up being some sort of riot by people who are offended by whatever
verdict of his so-called peers that a jury winds up arriving at?
“I’m
very scared for it. It obviously weighs heavily upon my mind,” Van Dyke said.
SOME,
I’M SURE, will think back to the days of 1968 – where the Democratic National
Convention protesters were not the only ones who experienced violence that
year.
It
was also the year that Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr., was killed by a
racist-motivated assassin – and many black neighborhoods across the nation wound
up in flames. Including in Chicago, where there are parts of the city’s West Side
that for years remained in rubble and where they never recovered from the
damage.
Does
Van Dyke think he could be the cause of a similar reaction if he winds up being
acquitted of the criminal charges? I don’t doubt some people would be grossly
offended – and I have heard some activist types speculate how they fear this
trial is headed for acquittal.
Van Dyke makes Page One in worst way possible |
As
though they expect “the establishment” will be prepared to protect a police
officer because his “victim” was just a young, black male – particularly one
whom prosecutors seem eager to label as a violent troublemaker who brought his
fate upon himself.
TO
TELL YOU the truth, I’m inclined to think it’s the other side that could get ugly
– although I’d like to think that all could wind up showing some sense of
self-restraint.
For
in this Age of Trump that our society is now in, there are people who will be
eager to defend Van Dyke as a cop doing his duty. They’ll want to think any
kind of punishment is improper – and evidence that our society is all awry and
out-of-whack with common sense.
People
often talk about how there are “two Chicagos,” one upscale and thriving while
the other is a dumping ground for those individuals whom the elite don’t want
near them.
Could
it be that Van Dyke and one’s attitude towards his actions will merely wind up
being yet another bit of evidence as to which Chicago faction one falls into?
EVEN
VAN DYKE himself realizes he’s going to be remembered in our city’s history for
reasons he likely would never have dreamed possible and probably wishes he
could avoid at all costs.
There
is, of course, the ironic part of Van Dyke feeling compelled to submit to a
newspaper interview. Prosecutors and his defense attorneys will be looking to
pick a jury from those individuals who paid absolutely no attention to what was
said or written about the case.
Meaning
his words technically won’t influence them when they decide his fate of “guilt”
or “innocence.”
They’re
more meant to influence the way the rest of us think when we make our snap
judgments after the trial is over about just how stupid that jury could possibly
be for the verdict they ultimately reach.
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment