All too absurd, but also accurate, a perception we have of our state |
WITH
CHICAGO BEING merely one of them, and trying to act as though we don’t
acknowledge the other “cities” that exist in Illinois.
That
mentality is what largely is behind the measure signed into law this week by
Gov. Bruce Rauner – one that says state agencies must regard Springfield as the
default location for where employees on the state payroll are based.
Even
though the trend of the past couple of decades is to recognize that the bulk of
people who live in this state are up here along (or near) the shores of Lake
Michigan.
Which
causes griping amongst the people based in the Springfield offices of assorted
state agencies because they want to be thought of as the home base – rather
than just a distant outpost some 200 miles from the focal point of our state’s
activity.
RAUNER: Gaining political points for self |
THIS
BECOMES A political tactic in that it is an act Rauner can point to in his
efforts to gain enough votes from the partisans of central and Southern
Illinois come the Nov. 6 elections that he can dream of overcoming the many
Chicago-area voters who likely are determined to turn out to the polls to vote
against Bruce (amongst others).
Rauner,
who himself includes a Chicago city-based condominium among the several
residences he owns (he’s that wealthy), is taking sides in the perpetual split
between Chicago and rural Illinois.
Which
actually is similar to the chasm that exists nationally between urban and rural
– with those people who prefer the isolated lifestyle unable to comprehend that
they’re in the minority of our society; largely because they don’t know many
people different from themselves.
BLAGOJEVICH: Pot shots at former gov |
The
new law says every job title would have to have a location attached to it – and
any position to be based in an office outside of Springfield would have to have
a justification attached as to why it shouldn’t be a part of the Statehouse
Scene.
A
STUDY CONDUCTED for the Illinois Department of Central Management Services
(essentially, the personnel department for state government) suggested that
several hundred jobs currently based in Chicago ought to be relocated to
Springfield.
Personally,
I think it would be our state government’s loss if it were to carry this line
of logic to an extreme. I suspect they’d find a loss in the quality of
employees they’d find willing to take a state job if it meant having to endure
“capital punishment” – which in political slang means to have to actually spend
time in Springfield when the General Assembly itself isn’t in session.
The river IS why Chicago became what it is. Photo by Gregory Tejeda |
Blagojevich,
of course, was the governor who was so unenthralled with showing up at state
facilities that he eventually came to do the bulk of his work at an office in
his Ravenswood neighborhood home – or at one set up in his ward, almost as
though he were just a local political boss.
PERSONALLY,
I THINK these regional spats have the potential to hold us back – since
Illinois’ greatest advantage truly is that it has elements of all the parts of
our society as a whole.
Would Abe have become a White Stockings fan |
We
ought to try to feed off our knowledge for the collective good.
Instead
of thinking there’s something special about promoting the idea of our capital
city – which itself is truly a product of 19th Century mentality.
After all, we are a state whose settlement originally began in Southern
Illinois, with people presuming that a city like Cairo (where the Mississippi
and Ohio rivers converge) would be our pride and joy. We evolved into a place
that emphasized Chicago because of its Lake Michigan/Chicago River location (while Cairo has withered away to a town of merely 2,000 people).
There’s
even the fact that the family of Springfield’s most famed resident (none other
than Abraham Lincoln) eventually moved on to Chicago itself. Would “Honest Abe,”
if he had lived long enough to be a retired president, have wound up praising
the joys of life in what came to be known as the Second City?
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment