You
just know that name is going to bring about derision amongst Chicago sporting
fans for the Chicago Fire professional soccer club.
SeatGeek the stadium off in the distance from the Loop |
BUT
IT SEEMS the Fire (not the actual blaze from 1871, but the team playing in a
stadium built for their use out in suburban Bridgeview) will allow their home
pitch to be given that public identity with the coming of the 2019 season.
This
is the final year that their stadium will carry the name Toyota Park.
Which
as far as I’m concerned isn’t really a loss, since I don’t care for building names
that are meant to be nothing more than advertising for somebody else’s product.
I’d love it if the building in which the Chicago Bulls and Chicago Blackhawks
had never been given a name promoting the interests of United Airlines.
But
at least that was a Chicago-area entity. Unlike Toyota, which sells their
products throughout the Chicago area, here but doesn’t really make them here.
Soldier, or Soldiers? Front room, or fronchroom? |
For
the record, I had to look it up, since I had no idea what SeatGeek was. It
seems it’s a website (seatgeek.com) where one can go to find tickets to various
types of events. Including sports.
And
including professional soccer.
A corporate identity of nearly three decades |
It
seems the company is an official Major League Soccer corporate partner, and the
Minnesota United, Portland Timbers, Seattle Sounders, Sporting Kansas City and
LAFC (a Los Angeles-area team that competes with the more traditionally-named
Los Angeles Galaxy) have partnerships.
I
SUPPOSE WE should also include the Chicago Fire on that list, since the company
has now bought the right to have their identity on the Fire’s building.
For
what it’s worth, Bloomberg Markets reported that the deal could result in
payments of up to $4 million annually to the Chicago Fire. Not a bad sum,
although I wonder how seriously people will take a name like “SeatGeek.”
It
makes me wonder if Chicago Fire fans will go out of their way to refuse to use
the name and come up with their own identity for the stadium out in the
southwestern suburb (not far from Midway Airport, if you must know).
Although
I wonder if SeatGeek could surpass Guaranteed Rate Field in terms of an unpopular
identity for sporting fans to use. Yes, there are many Chicago White Sox fans
who haven’t come to terms with the latest corporate name the White Sox bought
for themselves two years ago.
Is baseball's sporting superiority in large part because "Sox Park" ... |
Although
when it comes to Chicago stadium identities, I always thought the most off-beat
debate concerned the home of the Chicago Bears and the great number of
allegedly hard-core fans who persist in calling the building “Soldiers Field”
rather than the proper “Soldier.”
... and "Cubs Park" make sense? |
By
comparison, I’m sure there will be some sports fans who will show derision for
professional soccer (mostly because they don’t comprehend “real” football, which ain't da game da Bears play so badly these days) by
refusing to acknowledge the Bridgeview stadium altogether.
It’s
a shame that all sports teams can’t be like our baseball clubs – where there
are some people who steadfastly call the stadiums “Sox Park” and “Cubs Park”
regardless of whatever name appears on the marquee. That would make sporting
sense, even if it wouldn’t generate the million-dollar payoffs for the teams
themselves.
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment