Even his rant that the “election’s over” is predictable, if not terribly clever or witty.
BUT
THERE’S SOMETHING just ever so pathetic about Trump’s insistence that there
were “paid” people showing up to create the image of an American populace that
doesn’t think highly of our newly-elected (he’s still in his first 100 days of
office) president.
I
know personally I learned of the rallies being held across the country off a
website that encouraged people to go (I didn’t). Those included the Daley Plaza
rally that attracted a few thousand individuals in its own right, along with
rallies in the outer suburbs of Naperville and Chesterton, Ind., that drew a
few hundred.
But
there wasn’t anything indicating any form of compensation for anyone who showed
up. It might have been more accurate for the Trumpites to argue these people
need to “get a life,” (dancing in front of a giant, inflatable chicken erected outside
the Trump Tower in Chicago) rather than they’re being bribed.
Particularly
since there is evidence that Trump, during his campaign, goosed up the size of
his own supportive crowds with some cash payments. Could it be that Trump is
like one-time baseball manager Billy Martin, who assumed the whole world was
out to get him and concocted strategies based off what he thought everyone else
was doing to him?
IF
TRUE, IT is sad. It is sorry. It is lame.
It is truly evidence of someone who needs to get a life, particularly since as he himself put it, he “won” the 2016 presidential election, and ought to enjoy the position’s perks – rather than concocting conspiracies against himself.
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment