CLINTON: Race all that matters to some |
Remember
how after a few primaries in the 2008 election cycle, Barack Obama had built up
a lead and some momentum? Yet the reality is he didn’t actually clinch the
Democratic Party’s nomination until the very end when all the primaries and
caucuses were complete.
THAT’S
BECAUSE THINGS reached a stalemate of sorts about half-way through the process.
Many of those states who came up later in the election cycle and usually are
irrelevant (because the nomination has been all but clinched by then) were
suddenly very relevant.
And
many voters in those states, realizing that their political party could wind up
nominating a black man (I don’t want to hear from those who will argue that
Obama technically is bi-racial with a white mother), suddenly started giving
Hillary Clinton a second look.
She
started winning more votes. She slowed the process by which Obama ultimately was
nominated. There was the sense that some people who want to use the label of
Democrat and think of themselves in progressive terms just couldn’t bring
themselves to vote for a black man.
Are
we going to see something similar happen in this election cycle?
ADMITTEDLY,
CLINTON’S OPPONENT this time around isn’t a black man. But as a precinct
captain in Clark County, Nev., told a gathering of would-be voters prior to the
weekend’s caucuses, the reason not to vote for Bernie Sanders is because he’s a
“socialist Jew.”
OBAMA: He won, despite issue |
As
in, he ain’t a real person, which is defined by some as being white, and
possibly even Protestant (although others think they’re being big and generous
by including Catholics).
Could
it be that such a sentiment could spread to other states – including our very
own Illinois where our primaries are scheduled for three weeks from Tuesday?
Could this wind up influencing the political party whose members like to think
they’re above such thought?
It
has me remembering a person who speculated to me about a month ago who said the
only chance Donald Trump truly has to become president is if the Democrats
nominate the senator from Vermont because this country isn’t ready to accept
someone who does not think of the label of “socialist” as something to renounce
UNLIKE
SANDERS, WHO in his Senate service has wound up being part of the Democratic
caucus only because otherwise he’d be all alone if he tried to have a Socialist
caucus within Congress.
WASHINGTON: Experienced similar reaction |
Is
this going to be the reason many people will wind up convincing themselves to
vote for Hillary Clinton for the Democratic nomination for president? So that
they don’t have to learn to make the distinction between Socialism and
Communism?
I
accept that the kind of people who these days identify themselves as
Republicans aren’t the least bit interested in making that distinction, or
really understanding what socialism is.
Which
is why I would expect the idea of attacks based on Sanders being a “socialist
Jew” to step up once the primary cycle is over and we have to start seeing the
Democratic and Republican nominees take each other on.
THERE
IS ONE positive aspect to this issue – the Jewish Week newspaper reported on
the incident in Nevada, and said that the caucus-goers actually voted to stop
the precinct captain in question from speaking the moment he uttered his
Sanders attack.
SANDERS: An educational moment for society |
It
seems some people were appalled enough by the utterance (or perhaps scared by
what it represents about themselves) that they put a stop to it. Yet let’s not
forget that Clinton won those Nevada caucuses – which supposedly put a halt to
any electoral momentum Sanders might be gaining.
This
kind of reminds me of the Chicago mayoral elections of the 1980s when Harold
Washington was on the ballot and could never seem to gain as many votes in
white parts of Chicago as he might sense he’d get on the campaign trail. He
said he suspected many white voters said the right things, but then walked into
the voter booth and just couldn’t bring themselves to vote for a black face.
Is
the thought of a president wearing a yarmulke going to create the same
resistance? We’ll have to see just how much hostility we still have in our 21st
Century society.
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment