RAUNER: What will he say? |
BUT AS FOR any specific policies or changes or anything that he might try putting forward as the reason for government to exist at all in 2016? I doubt there will be much of any substance.
In
fact, I have to admit to being glad I won’t be at the Statehouse in Springfield
to actually hear the address, and certainly don’t think there will be a need to
try to watch a broadcast of the speech on one of those public access television
programs that nobody but government geeks pays any attention to anyway.
It
will all be partisan trash-talk, as will be the official responses that the
General Assembly’s leaders will feel compelled to make once the governor is
through talking.
So
the “State of the State” of Illinois for 2016? It’s the same as in 2015 – total
chaos caused by the fact we have delved into the type of partisan politics that
has long dominated our federal government scene.
ALTHOUGH
FOR THOSE who try to make some sort of comparison by claiming that Rauner is
going through the same level of partisan attacks that Barack Obama gets from
the Republican-run Congress, I’d have to say “nonsense.”
The activity taking place here these days ... |
To
paraphrase the late Sen. Lloyd Bentsen, Rauner, you are no Barack Obama.
If
anything, our governor is trying to give the same partisan tactics used in
Congress some level of credibility within Illinois state government. Although
that actually isn’t 100 percent correct either.
The
ideologues in Congress are about trying to give dominance to a certain segment
of society based off select interpretations of moralistic issues. Rauner is
about trying to give his business buddies a government that will coddle their
concerns over all else in our society – so as to benefit their bottom line.
... bears too much resemblance to Capitol Hill activity |
I
SUPPOSE IT’S like the old Reaganomics theory of “trickle down,” that if the
most wealthy are doing well, somehow we all will benefit from their wealth.
Although it’s been my own observation that when the wealthy are doing well,
they take on measures meant to ensure that they keep as much as possible – and that
nothing trickles down.
Perhaps
this is the kind of talk we’ll hear from the governor on Wednesday.
It’s
going to be a speech that tries to justify the past year – one in which we’re
now seven months through the current fiscal year without being anywhere close
to having a balanced budget in place.
And
where the only reason certain government agencies continue to run is because
the federal courts have ordered they do so.
WHICH
IS A mess because the state never took the actions necessary to ensure there’d
be enough funds to get through Fiscal 2016. Either by some sort of revenue
enhancement/tax increase or some sort of major cut to keep the state within the
level of cash it actually will have on hand.
And
yes, government has obligations that must be met. So I don’t want to hear the
cheap rhetoric about “living within one’s means.”
MADIGAN: Is it his fault? |
So
we’re at the point now where we’re getting ready to hear in coming weeks about
a budget proposal for Fiscal 2017 (which begins July 1), even though we still
don’t have the budget in place for ’16 – and probably never will get one. It would
be nice if Rauner could use the “State of the State” to try to explain himself
and his past year’s actions. But I don’t expect we’ll get that.
Unless
you take seriously a speech that basically boils down to the theme of “It’s
Mike Madigan’s fault!”
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment