JONES: Meant to vote "yes" |
Yet
it seems that some legislators don’t want to have to take criticism for how the
official record will record their stance. In the Illinois House, the final vote
was 89-28.
ONE
OF THE people who did not vote was state Rep. Thaddeus Jones, D-Calumet City.
Is he really position-less on the matter?
Or
is he telling the truth when, as he explained after the vote was taken, he
meant to vote “yes” but that the device on his desk that allows him to vote on
bills did not function.
Did
someone really “turn off” his device to prevent him from being vote number 90?
Who’s to say!
Although
his explanation bothers me less than that of state Rep. Edward Acevedo,
D-Chicago, who is recorded as voting “yes” for the bill, but says he wants to
be thought of as having voted “present.”
NOT
THE BOLDEST of actions – although it prevents the National Rifle
Association-types from being able to criticize him on the issue.
So
now, the issue goes to Gov. Pat Quinn – who likely will sign it to avoid legal
catastrophe from being imposed by the federal appeals courts. Although this is
a man who has been willing to say “no” to the gambling interests who dream of
more and more casinos across Illinois.
ACEVEDO: Pushed the wrong button |
And
we may soon have a law that allows those people in rural parts of the state to
carry pistols for use against anyone they feel threatens them – although the
larger municipalities with Home Rule powers will have the ability to push their
own restrictions on firearms.
Which
will tick off the rural interests; for whom a large part of this whole issue
was imposing their perspective on firearms onto Chicago and the whole state.
SO
FOR THOSE who are upset that Illinois won’t be in a group with California and
New York (states that give their local police great authority to reject
applications for firearms permits), keep in mind that the law could have wound
up much worse!
Although
I’m still waiting for the first incident where someone who is armed gets
crocked in a restaurant that serves liquor, then feels threatened by the
presence of another patron in the booth two seats away.
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment