I guess I won't be seeing any more Alex Jones or Louis Farrakhan on Facebook any longer. Not that I would have paid attention to either if they had crept their way onto my page. |
WHICH,
OF COURSE, has those individuals’ backers convinced that their thoughts are
being censored. Violations of freedom of speech are taking place. Social media
is behaving in an un-American manner.
Or
so the ideologues would have us believe.
Personally,
I’m not all that bothered that someone decided to cut off the Facebook (and
Instagram) access to people like Alex Jones, Milo Yiannopoulos and Louis
Farrakhan.
The
latter is a black nationalist type and long-time leader of the Nation of Islam –
an organization that manages to offend many non-black people for taking the
stance that black people ought to be allowed to stand up for themselves against
the Anglo majority.
THE
OTHERS ARE right-wing pundits who like to use the mini-blurbs that Facebook
encourages to disseminate their thoughts – most of which are along the lines of
they’re absolutely RIGHT and it’s the rest of us who have to pipe down and
learn to do what we’re told to.
Personally,
I’ll defend the right of any of these individuals to think whatever nonsense
they want to. If they’re really stupid enough to believe the trash they spew,
it’s their loss. It ultimately will wind up being the reason they fall behind
in our society and wind up as life’s losers.
But
the problem is that too many of these ideologues try to tout the notion that everybody
else is required to go along with their trash-talk. They think that on the
issues, they’re entitled to have the ‘last’ word – on everything.
Farrakhan has his own newspaper to publish his thoughts. He doesn't need Facebook |
THE
VERY CONCEPT of freedom of expression is that the operators of Facebook and
Instagram (along with any other entity) have the right to decide what it is
they wish to publish. No one has a right to dictate their content to them.
And
if someone is making a conscious decision that Farrakhan – or any of the other
ding-dongs who have been cut off – is too absurd to want to give a platform to,
we ought to be praising those people.
It’s
the American Way truly at work. No one has a right to force them to do anything
against their interest. And if it truly turns out that someone is making a bad
call that does not go along with the majority interests, then things will work
out. Facebook fanatics and Instagram geeks will take out their support for
these people by cutting back their own use.
Which
eventually would harm those entities. Dealing with the dissemination of information
carries that dual-edged sword – get tyrannical with the way you control the
flow of fact and opinion, and people will eventually decide you’re not worthy
of being taken seriously. They’ll cut you off. You'll become irrelevant.
BUT
I THINK we’re going to find out that the majority won’t have any real objections.
If anything, they’ll probably find a Facebook with a little bit less nonsense
being spewed. Perhaps even something that might well be worthy of being taken
seriously.
Does broadcaster Jones really require a Facebook platform to express himself? |
Just
as I have my own Facebook page that offers up links to the very same commentaries
I publish here. It’s an inexpensive way of getting more people to read this
stuff -- nothing more!
Facebook
could, I suppose, decide to cut me off. Whining about it, if they did, would
strike me as being as pathetic as Jones or Farrakhan thinking they’re being
victimized. Although I suspect the two of them are most offended by the fact
that someone lumped the two of them together into a single class of ideological
knuckleheads.
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment