Will new governor have to take marching orders … |
Yet
there are those who are persisting with such political rhetoric as to say the
only person who’s really going to influence him is the guy who will actually
run the state.
… from Mr. Speaker himself? |
NONE
OTHER THAN Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan, D-Chicago. As though they
can’t let go of all the trash talk that they tried to use to tie everybody in
sight to Madigan so it would cost them re-election.
It
didn’t work. Yet we’re still hearing the trash talk.
I
got my kick out of the Daily Herald newspaper account where Jeanne Ives, the ideologue
who tried (but failed) to beat Bruce Rauner herself, said she thinks Illinois
is safe from any sort of progressive tax hike.
Although
state government certainly could use the money to make real progress toward
paying off all the bills it accumulated during Rauner’s partisan efforts to
undermine organized labor’s influence, Ives said she believes Madigan won’t let
the Democrat-dominated General Assembly approve any such thing.
Radogno and Edgar (below) … |
SHE
SAYS MADIGAN is political astute enough to realize a large segment of the population
would disapprove, possibly even revolt, and would start electing Republicans
again if Democrats get to brazen.
“I
think Mike Madigan will still run the state,” Ives told the suburban-based newspaper.
“He is savvy and knows the state can’t withstand another tax increase.”
So
is J.B. really nothing more than Madigan’s puppet; expected to sign off on
whatever bills Madigan (with state Senate President John Cullerton’s cooperation)
allows to get as far as the gubernatorial desk?
… are among those advising J.B. these days |
Or
is Ives, the state senator from Wheaton (no longer a bastion of the Republican Party)
merely trying to maintain a semblance of relevance in today’s Illinois political
age?
THIS
IS A debate I have heard often – trying to figure out who’s really in charge
these days! Because it is likely (if not downright predictable) that there will
be a falling-out between Pritzker and Madigan. A rivalry will develop within
the party over who ought to be listening to whom. Which is why people used to think Illinois would never have Democrats as governor -- Madigan wouldn't permit anyone who could undermine his influence!
Pritzker
may well adopt the attitude that the people picked HIM to be governor, while
Madigan may well feel J.B. is a political amateur who’s never run NOTHING and who
ought to leave the governing to the big boys who have been doing this for
awhile.
I’ve
even heard it said that Pritzker is in a unique position to challenge such
incumbent thought because he’s so wealthy. Similar to how Rauner tried to buy
the Republican Party political structure to support his own desires, Pritzker
has the kind of money to where he could be the guy that Democrats turn to for
political support, instead of having to rely on Madigan’s labor connections to
raise their political funds.
Particularly
since within the Democratic Party structures across the nation, there are
splits between establishment types supporting the current structure, and those
who want a more politically progressive structure.
AFTER
ALL, WHAT’S the point of having a not-so-liberal Democratic Party? You might as
well be a Republican, is their attitude. Madigan himself is most definitely of
the party’s establishment – a guy who backs the Democrats because of his
support for organized labor and its interests.
IVES: Trying to retain relevance |
There
are times when he seems to dread having to deal with more liberal elements and
social causes. Only backing them when he can figure a way to turn them to his
own interests. But that may be the relevant point – Madigan is a political
mastermind who can figure ways to use issues for a greater good, so to speak.
We
all saw how Rauner’s efforts to use his money to buy a political party for himself
failed to the point where some now wonder if the Illinois Republican Party has
anything left worth use! Could Pritzker be just as inept without Madigan’s
mindset on his side.
Could
it be in everybody’s interest that the two men figure out a way to cooperate?
Which could mean the true threat to the people of Illinois is that Democrats
are not really the united force for liberal causes in the way that elements of the modern-day
Republicans have become the party wishing to force conservatism down all our
throats.
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment