Does Bost's congressional victory ... |
For
it would seem the parts of Illinois that were already Republican are now
moreso.
THOSE
AREAS MIGHT well be the parts of the state that lie outside the Chicago
metropolitan area. But those are often areas that think of themselves as an
entity to their own.
… console Republicans for Roskam's loss? |
Which
means I’m not surprised many of those people are feeling thankful they have so
thoroughly chased Democratic Party interests out of their portion of the state.
They may think they now have domination of the only portions of Illinois that
matter.
Then
again, I wouldn’t be surprised to learn a similar sentiment exists within the
Chicago area that isn’t all too concerned about these political losses, because
they managed to take portions of the outer suburbs that oft were represented by
Republicans in the past, but have now swung over to the Dems. Heck, Illinois Republican Chairman Tim Schneider couldn't even win re-election to his post on the Cook County Board!
The
bottom line is that Illinois’ congressional delegation come January will
consist of 13 Democrats and only 5 Republicans – a two-seat gain for “da Dems.”
Are Underwood and Casten (below) … |
RANDY
HULTGREN AND Peter Roskam will be gone, replaced by Lauren Underwood and Sean
Casten. Throughout levels of government, the Republican Party became irrelevant throughout the Chicago-area.
Yet
for those anxious to wear the Republican-tinged glasses to view things, Tuesday
was the night that Rep. Mike Bost, R-Ill., fought off Democrat Brendan Kelly
and Rep. Rodney Davis beat Democrat Betsy Dirksen Londrigan.
Albeit
the latter was by a narrow voter margin of 50.51 percent to 49.49 percent.
But
Davis is a member of Congress from the Champaign-area representing a swath of
central Illinois, while Bost is from around Carbondale and is the lone
representative on Capitol Hill of that region of Southern Illinois that thinks
of itself as “Egypt.”
… gain, or losses, for Illinois? |
THE
FACT THAT Roskam and Hultgren will be gone? I’m sure the ideologues will think
it was more important to keep Davis and Bost.
Heck,
let’s note that when President Donald Trump felt inclined to come to Illinois
to campaign on behalf of Republicans in general, he went to Bost’s district for
a political “fly-in” rally. The president himself said earlier this week that
Roskam’s defeat was because the two-decade political incumbent “didn’t want the
embrace” of presidential support.
Although
I suspect if Roskam had actively touted himself as a “Trump Man,” he would have
had his political clock cleaned by an even bigger margin than the 52.84 percent
to 47.16 percent tally he actually lost by.
What
caught my eye in looking at the congressional district map for Illinois is that
there is one point right down the middle of the state where one could go
straight through from the Wisconsin border all the way to where the Mississippi
and Ohio rivers converge (a.k.a., Cairo) and never set foot in a Democratic-represented
area.
THE
SAME WOULD apply if you traveled from the east edge of Illinois around Danville
to the far west around Quincy. Nothing but political “red” on the map.
Too easy for Illinoisans to ignore other party |
You’d
be passing in between the Chicago and Quad-Cities areas, and also skipping over
the Illinois portions of the St. Louis area – which, if you think about it, are
the portions of Illinois that comprise nearly three-quarters of the state’s
population.
Which
is how Democrats were able to gain Illinois House seats in suburban portions of
Illinois to once-again have a 60 percent “veto-proof” supermajority, while
allowing Republicans to feel like they still kept control of the rural parts of
the state. We
in Illinois may come out of this year’s election cycle thinking our region
prevailed, even though we’re progressing to the point of becoming two separate
regions.
Let’s hope Gov.-elect J.B. Pritzker wasn’t just paying lip service when he said this week Chicago will “have no more special a role” than other Illinois cities, because having us work together as a state is how we’ll be capable of accomplishing anything of significance in the future for all our benefit.
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment