Chicago's next mayor will be, … who knows? |
Next
Monday is the deadline for candidates for the Feb. 26 municipal elections to
file their nominating petitions to even get on the ballot, and we’re going to
learn how many of those people were politically incompetent enough that they
couldn’t get the 12,500 signatures of support needed to qualify.
WE’RE
GOING TO see how many of the so-called candidates of earlier this year will not
even be a factor in the final discussion over who should replace Rahm Emanuel
in the mayor’s office.
If
anything, I gained some respect earlier this week when I learned that Troy
LaRaviere, head of the Chicago Principals and Administrators Association, was
giving up his campaign before it even began.
He
was honest enough to admit he couldn’t get a sufficient number of signatures of
support, thereby making any effort to run for mayor an exercise in futility.
Of
course, he’ll probably be remembered in this election cycle as the guy whose farewell
to the campaign season was to take a pot shot at entertainer Kanye West – who
apparently reached out early on to the LaRaviere camp with thoughts of publicly
supporting him.
LaRAVIERE: First to see jolt of reality |
WEST,
OF COURSE, is one of several entertainers who are now backing the mayoral
dreams of Amara Enyia, an experienced public policy professional who has never
actually run for office herself.
LaRaviere
let it be known he couldn’t accept West’s support because the man’s too
friendly with President Donald Trump (remember that goofy Oval Office meeting
between the two of a few weeks ago?).
The
trick of anticipating the upcoming week is to figure out how many of the mayoral
dreamers will come to their senses before the Nov. 26 deadline. Of course, people
with political aspirations usually are delusional enough to think so highly of themselves
they can’t see their own flaws.
So
we may get a lot of them fighting for a ballot space, just so they can take 1
percent or so of the vote come the end of February.
FIORETTI: Latest with mayoral dreams |
TAKE
ROBERT FIORETTI – the one-time outspoken alderman who has since run for mayor
and Cook County Board president. He let it be known this week he’s getting into
the mayoral mix again.
I
understand that having a political post is more interesting for a legal-minded
person than having a mere law practice. Yet Fioretti comes across these days as
somebody who runs for office because he needs a job! Not necessarily because he
has ideas beneficial to our society at-large.
So
Fioretti is working these days, as are other candidates, in gathering the necessary
petition signatures to qualify. By Fioretti’s admission, he’s trying to gain
some 30,000 signatures, because he knows the political powers-that-be are
capable of having their people come up with ways to disqualify signatures so as
to void them out.
Time for a new 'Mayor' Daley, … |
It
may even turn out that some of those who do file their petitions next week will
be unable to actually appear on the ballot.
PERSONALLY,
I’M GOING to find it interesting how many of the candidates who have been
talking up the mayor’s race for months on end will be amongst those who
qualify. Will Rahm Emanuel turn out to be correct when he said upon his own announcement
he would not seek re-election that Chicago’s next mayor wasn’t even in the race
yet?
Implying
that people like former Chicago Police Superintendent Garry McCarthy and former
Chicago Public Schools CEO Paul Vallas were kidding themselves, and that the
rest of the dozens of mayoral dreamers were truly delusional.
… or is Chicago ready for Mendoza's youth |
Will
this really become a campaign dominated by the big-time political names of
Daley (as in William), Chico (as in Gery) and Preckwinkle (as in Toni)? With
the real question becoming whether the kid (as in 46-year-old Susana Mendoza)
can do enough to get herself taken seriously. Or whether Willie Wilson attracts any political support outside of a few select political precincts on the South and West sides?
There’s
a lot of uncertainty be settled between now and April 2 – the date of the
run-off election likely to be needed. I wonder if the only certainty now is the
appropriateness of the election so close to April Fool’s Day. We may wind up
feeling like the election results are a practical joke on all of us.
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment