Even though she’s, strictly speaking, a candidate for Illinois comptroller come Tuesday.
THE
PARTISANS WHO hate the idea of Mendoza winning anything are trying to claim her
behavior is that of a political hypocrite. A selfish person who’s trying to put
her grubby little paws all over everything in sight.
Why
doesn’t she just make up her mind? The latter thought literally was expressed
by my father, who admits he’s inclined to hold the whole affair against her.
Although
I can’t help but think the people who are turning this whole situation into an
issue are the ones who realize, deep-down, that they got nothin’ on Mendoza,
and aren’t about to beat her any other way.
This
issue is the work of political desperation. Darlene Senger likely isn’t going
to go anywhere following Tuesday’s elections. As for Claire Ball, she’s likely
to be as insignificant as every other person who has run under the Libertarian
Party political banner.
SO
WHAT SHOULD we think of Mendoza? Personally, I’m swayed by the notion there have
been many political people throughout the years who have decided to move up to a
higher-ranking political post – even though they already have a post in which
to serve.Who's Susana's real opponent -- Senger … |
Mendoza
wouldn’t be a “first” if she were to try to run for mayor come the Feb. 26
election cycle (and again in an April run-off election, if one turns out to be
necessary).
I
also get that circumstances such as having the mayoral post open with no
incumbent seeking it does not come up every election cycle. This could be a
matter of a politically ambitious person deciding the circumstances are proper
right now for a move up.
So
it likely will wind up that Senger will complain all she wants about Mendoza,
but a majority of the electorate won’t be swayed. That GOP label could become
so tarnished by Trump that it drags her down to defeat with a lot of others.… or Preckwinkle? |
ALTHOUGH
IN ALL honesty, the Republican label in Illinois is so weak that there are many
political posts up for grabs come Tuesday that there are NO Republican
challengers.
That’s
why it’s hard to get a grasp locally on how strong the support is for President
Donald Trump. He’s irrelevant locally.
If
it turns out there is a “red tsunami” of voters that benefits backers of the Trumpster,
it’s going to mean creation of a governmental structure that will go out of its
way to snub Chicago interests.
Of
course, Mendoza could turn out to be right about the “bluenami” that will
benefit the political interests of those people wishing to undermine Trump for
the next two years.
TO
THAT END, Mendoza appears to have interests in becoming mayor (which is a more
prominent post than that of Illinois comptroller, which many people stumble
over when trying to pronounce).
I’m inclined to believe her when she says her political operatives shot some stray rough footage touting her for mayor, while also doing the work on comptroller campaign ads. She’s being real in admitting that she’d have to make a sudden shift in focus, IF she decides to make the move up.
So
anybody who expects her to make a solid decision now and commit to one post is
not being realistic. If anything, they’re showing their support for a political
opponent who isn’t capable of running a credible opposition campaign.
And
as for the idea of “Mayor” Mendoza, the real issue is whether voters think she’s
too young (she’s 46) now, or whether they think other candidates (including
Toni Preckwinkle, who’s 71) are a batch of old fuddy-duddies?
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment