Which
is a nice boost for Chicago’s South Side – it will mean recognition for
historic events that took place in the area around 111th Street and Cottage
Grove Avenue and will give tourists a reason to trek south and all the way to
the Pullman neighborhood.
BUT
SIMILAR LOGIC can be used to justify the presidential museum and library being
proposed for either Washington or Jackson parks near the University of Chicago.
A site for that museum is supposed to be chosen some time in March.
It
would be nice for the South Side and far South Side if both of these major
attractions were to come to Chicago this year. Heck, it would be nice for the
city as a whole.
But
being able to claim both of these attractions on the oft-neglected segment of
Chicago south of Cermak Road would truly be an economic boost – along with a
jolt to the pride of the great South Side!
Then
again, it seems like way too much for the South Side to be getting both of
these attractions within what could be one month’s time span.
WHEN
I LEARNED of the likelihood of the national park designation for Pullman, my
reaction was to wonder if this is the consolation prize for the eventual announcement
that the Obama museum and library really is headed for Columbia – and I don’t
mean the college on Michigan Avenue.
Now
I don’t have any hard fact that says the Columbia University proposal is going
to be the one picked by Barack and Michelle Obama to house their political and
social legacy. This could literally be my paranoia running amok!
But
would giving Chicago this Pullman attraction be the way of trying to assuage the
ego of Chicago when it comes out next month that the Second City got skunked by
either New York City or Honolulu?
I’m
wondering how many people will try to pin down the president during his Pullman
visit on Feb. 19 as to where in the process the presidential museum/library is.
WILL
OBAMA FEEL more love for his undergraduate alma mater than the law school where
he was once an instructor and in the neighborhood where he once lived (and
still owns a home)?
I
hope this isn’t really the way this scenario is playing out. Yet when political
people are involved with something, there’s always the possibility of someone’s
self-interest needing to be served before anything can get done.
Personally,
all of the debate about dueling proposals seems like officials want to extort
from Chicago and the University of Chicago every possible concession. In short,
if we pay, it will come to us.
It
we don’t pay up, it will go elsewhere.
WHICH
MAY SATISFY those people who for whatever reason would just as soon not have
the Obama museum/library in Chicago – either because their vision of what the
city should be is cheap or because their ideology is just that snotty and
disrespectful.
But
for the rest of us (which various polls show is the majority of Chicagoans),
this is a worthy attraction that could help us better comprehend and display
the past several years when our political people really did reach the highest
seats of power!
Who
knows? Maybe it will work out!
In
which case, the winter months of 2015 could go into the local history books not
so much for all the darned snowfall we experienced, but for the two lasting
sites we attracted.
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment