Do we really need to see Sox rally-killing double plays so large? Image by Illinois Sports Facilities Authority |
It
seems to be more and more about the video boards that stadiums seem to think are
the keys to the success of the facilities in which they actually play their
games.
ANYBODY
WHO DOUBTS this ought to consider a couple of actions that occurred this week
in Chicago with regards to the facilities used by our city’s two professional
ball clubs.
A
U.S. District judge issued an order that rejected the lawsuit filed by owners
of apartment buildings across the street from Wrigley Field – the one that
challenged the legality of the video boards the ball club erected for 2015 and
for seasons to come.
Meanwhile,
the Illinois Sports Facilities Authority gave its approval to a new set of
video boards for U.S. Cellular Field. The center field scoreboard with its
iconic pinwheels (copied from the old Comiskey Park) will literally become a video
board, with additional boards erected beyond left and right fields.
Beginning
with 2016, people attending White Sox games will get to see a more grandiose display
of video replays – in case you missed the sight of Adam LaRoche striking out,
you can see it over and over and over again.
THE
SAME WILL be in place at Wrigley, as the legitimacy of those video boards that
block out the views from the rooftops of the apartments across the street from
the outfield was approved.
Personally,
I could care less. One of the reasons I actually enjoyed the last ballgame I
went to this season (back when the Yankees came to town) was that I was in a
centerfield seat with my back to the video boards.
The old ambiance of Sox and Cubs parks ... |
Although I suspect there are others who could care less, and probably enjoy the video-laced atmosphere, along with the ballplayers having their own personal “theme music” (usually some heavy-metal guitar riff or rap music tune). Maybe it’s not real until it has been on video?
... are definitely things of the past |
UNLESS
THE CHICAGO Cubs really are destined to go on and on to win the World Series
(rather than just being one-and-done against the Pittsburgh Pirates), it could
be that these video board announcements will be the highlights of this year for
Chicago baseball.
I
couldn’t help but be amused by the Crain’s Chicago Business report about the
U.S. Cellular video boards, which included the fact that the state was
obligated to upgrade the video boards because the current boards at the
ballpark are now considered antiquated compared to what other stadiums have.
The
White Sox’ lease with Illinois requires the building to be maintained to “major
league” standards. I can already hear the people complain about the state
wasting money that could have been put to use elsewhere.
Although
that lease (with all its perks to the ball club) is what ensures the White Sox
remain a viable financial entity and keeps Chicago’s status as a two-team town –
rather than becoming like St. Louis, Philadelphia or Boston.
AS
FOR THE Cubs, I have to confess some praise for Judge Virginia Kendall and her
ruling that tossed out the lawsuits brought by those apartment owners who tried
to bolster their own financial bottom-line by turning their rooftops into
private clubs (with people paying anywhere from $90-150 a seat) to view
ballgames.
Excuse me for not sympathizing for those rooftop club owners whose views are now permanently blocked. Image provided by Chicago Cubs |
For
a building that likes to promote the idea that it has the same character as
when it originally opened in 1914 (and where the Cubs will celebrate a century
of activity come next year), those rooftop clubs are so garish and un-historic.
Just
as tacky, perhaps, as the new video board for U.S. Cellular – and so unlike
anything that Bill Veeck had in mind when he had the original exploding
scoreboard put in place at Comiskey Park (or, for that matter, the ivy on the
walls at Wrigley).
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment