PENDLETON: She deserved better |
Which
is pathetic! Nobody deserves to have that fate be their life’s product.
BUT
IT IS the case for the 15-year-old who was shot to death Jan. 29 at a park
located less than a mile from the local residence of Barack Obama.
Much
has been made of the Obama connection – the idea that she died in an area we’d
prefer to think of as safe and pristine and that she partook in the
Inauguration festivities for Obama that occurred just a week prior to her
death.
As
I have written before, I think it sad that her life has been boiled down to
these two factual tidbits – as though she and her death wouldn’t have mattered
in the least if they hadn’t occurred.
But
now, she’s going to continue to gain national attention because of the fact
that Sen. Mark Kirk, R-Ill., says he wants to sponsor one of the gun control
measures likely to be considered by Congress this year. And he wants to put
Pendleton’s name on the bill.
“HADIYA’S
LAW” WILL be a measure meant to make it harder for people with criminal
backgrounds or other circumstances that are supposed to make it difficult for
them to obtain firearms to actually get them.
Which
also means that the National Rifle Association-types who like to demonize any
form of restriction on firearms ownership will wind up having to face the
possibility of voting against the image of that sweet-smiled teenager with the
nose so cute even though it’s a little big!
KIRK: Plunging back into work |
I
don’t doubt they’ll vote against it anyway. But I’d like to think it will make
the members of Congress who want to think the NRA is almighty twinge just a bit
before they flick the switch that casts their “no” vote.
As
for the proposal itself, it is all too similar to measures that have been
considered, and enacted, at the local level.
IT
WAS JUST a couple of weeks ago that the Cook County Board approved an ordinance
calling for significant fines against people who don’t report their firearms
stolen.
Law
enforcement types, including Cook County Sheriff Tom Dart, have said that many
people who purchase firearms with the intent of reselling them to people who
shouldn’t have them make the claim that the weapons were stolen – when they
wind up being used in criminal activity.
Under
Kirk’s proposal, which he’s co-sponsoring with Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y.,
it would become a federal offense for someone to let their legally-purchased
weapon lapse into the hands of someone else who should not have it.
Which
means we’re talking about prison time, in a federal correctional center. And
most likely at the 85 percent standard of time that must be served before one
can qualify for early release.
I
DON’T DOUBT that the truly criminal of minds will figure out a way to continue
to get firearms. But I don’t buy the line of logic that says such a reality
makes any sort of firearms restrictions a pointless measure.
So
it will be intriguing to see how Kirk, who only recently returned to his duties
following a year away from Capitol Hill due to a stroke, manages to succeed in
what will be his first significant governmental effort.
Although
much of the effort ultimately ought to go to Hadiya Pendleton, whose image will
provide the impetus to shame many of our members of Congress into doing the
right thing!
Even
though she probably deserves much better than to have her name become publicly
known as nothing more than the identity of a gun control law.
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment