HALVORSON: Which extreme is she? |
To
listen to the rhetoric being inspired by the political action committee headed
up by New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg – whose interest is in fighting for
tougher gun control measures and against the political influence of the National Rifle Association – Debbie is Illinois’ answer to Sarah Palin.
HALVORSON,
DURING HER two years (2009 and 2010) as a member of Congress, had a voting
record that wasn’t totally despised by the NRA (compared
to the “F” grade they gave to one-time state Rep. Robin Kelly).
But
now we’re supposed to believe that Halvorson is some sort of gun nut. Maybe she’s
out there in a corn field near her home in Crete at the edge of the Chicago
suburbs with an AK-47 shooting at deer – just like Palin encouraged the image
of herself hunting moose in the wilds of Alaska?
That
image of Halvorson is just too ridiculous to take seriously.
It’s
true that Halvorson says firearms restrictions alone won’t reduce urban
violence – she also says we ought to have more funding to create vocational
programs in hopes that non-college bound people will find some skills of use
that will detract them from the streets and gangs and violence.
BUT
THERE ARE people trying to push Debbie so far to the right that it’s downright
absurd. She's probably somewhere in the middle; we agree with her on some points, and disagree on others.
Actually,
it’s just as ridiculous as the rhetoric she faced back in the 2010 election
cycle. That was when the residents of rural Will County turned on Debbie despite
her life-long residency in the old Congressional district to send Republican
Adam Kinzinger to Congress.
She
was one of the targets of the “Tea Party” types who thought Halvorson was some
sort of liberal urban freak (a graduate of Bloom High School in Chicago Heights
and a Democrat who took marching orders from then-Senate President Emil Jones).
In fact, those people who live in her newly-crafted Congressional district are
the ones who are still going to dump on her for “liberal” tendencies – while
others will trash her for “conservative” leanings.
Halvorson
just can’t seem to win! No matter what she says or does.
NOW
THIS IS not meant as any kind of Halvorson endorsement. Personally, I think
circumstances are such that her time as an elected official has come and gone.
Twelve years in the Illinois Legislature and one term in the House of
Representatives is more time than many political dreamers ever get.
In
fact, I fear she could become the female version of Roland Burris (who spent a
decade’s worth of time in the 1990s and 2000s unsuccessfully running for office
and gradually making himself look more and more foolish with each campaign).
Although
I wonder if some sort of appointed post is in her future – particularly since
the man (Jesse Jackson, Jr.) who was so vehemently opposed to her getting an
Illinois transportation appointment is now gone from the political scene.
Unless she persists with future campaigns that chip away at her public
perception.
It’s
all in her own hands!
-30-
EDITOR'S NOTE: Insofar as the Bloomberg-inspired ads that Halvorson complains about, I just have one thought. How vehemently would New Yorkers react if Mayor Rahm Emanuel did or said anything to try to influence it? How quickly would they tell Rahm-bo to "stuff it!"
No comments:
Post a Comment