QUINN: Pipe down, for now |
But
I wish someone had managed to put a little bit of restraint on The Mighty Quinn
on Tuesday. His statement in support of the concept of gay marriage being legal
is not a new stance for him.
AND
THE ISSUE still has several steps to go before it gets to the point where he
actually gets a piece of paper in front of him, along with a collection of pens
so large that he literally will sign his name to it in tiny strokes – probably using
a separate pen just to cross the “t” in his first name.
Because
I’m sure there are several people who will want as a souvenir the pen the
Illinois governor used to strike down the laws that say marriage between
same-gender couples are not legitimate.
But
it seems that Quinn can’t wait for the chance to get boastful about this issue.
For
he literally issued a statement to congratulate the state Senate’s executive
committee for giving its recommendation to the measure on Tuesday.
FOR
WHAT IT’S worth, the executive committees in the state Senate and Illinois
House of Representatives are the ones where all the top-priority (in the minds
of the legislative leaders) issues are sent to.
Those
committees are loaded with top-level legislators who can be trusted by their
leaders to vote the way they’re supposed to.
Which
means that all the executive committee vote on Tuesday really meant is that
state Senate President John Cullerton, D-Chicago, sent the issue to a place
where the vote was rigged in a way to ensure its passage.
Considering
that Cullerton all along had said he would do this, it really isn’t that
significant.
FOR
THIS MEASURE is now in the part of the legislative process that a former
television correspondent at the Statehouse used to call “the five steps.” In
reality, there are many more steps as lobbyists get involved to exert their
undue influence on all issues.
But
this was “step one,” according to the civics textbook view of government.
Approval by a committee, followed by the second step of approval by the full
legislative chamber.
Then,
steps three and four consist of a committee approval and full chamber backing
in the other Legislative chamber – in this case, the House of Representatives,
where House Speaker Michael Madigan, D-Chicago, will get his chance to have a
say on the matter.
To
read through Quinn’s statement, you’d think he were signing the bill into law
right now – instead of having to endure a process where things could still go
wrong and some unforeseen development could thwart the matter.
BECAUSE
WHILE CULLERTON engages in rhetoric about giving this bill final state Senate
approval on Valentine’s Day as a nice gesture, there are still those people who
would take some sort of perverse pride in stalling this measure – if not
killing it outright.
It
has me wondering if Quinn’s statement will be perceived as a challenge. Dump
the guv! Is he tempting fate by making it seem as though this issue is already
won?
I’m
enough of a political paranoid that I don’t declare anything “won” until the
ink is dried on the bill.
I’m
sure some will try to argue that Quinn is trying to motivate the supporters of
the issue to act as swiftly as possible. Except that I don’t think this is an
issue where people can be swayed.
MANY
MAY VIEW Quinn’s comment that “marriage equality is a matter of fairness and
equal rights under law” as an incredibly obvious statement. Yet others will
challenge that belief, and I’d hate to think Quinn’s premature declaration will
provide them an incentive to work harder against it.
Because
while some people might try to claim this is an issue of Chicago imposing some
twisted viewpoint upon the “decent, god-fearing” people of the rest of
Illinois, I couldn’t help but notice one tidbit Quinn put into his statement.
That
being that individuals in 92 of Illinois’ 102 counties have taken advantage of the
civil unions option that has been in state law in recent years.
The
last I heard, metropolitan Chicago is at best only about eight counties large
(or 11 if you count Lake and Porter counties in Indiana or Kenosha County,
Wis.). That’s a lot of other people whom the ideologues are trying to ignore.
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment