Remaining neutral? |
With the "excitement" factor amongst the electorate focusing on the campaign of Lori Lightfoot for mayor, it seems that Cook County Board President Toni Preckwinkle is counting on having the "reliable" factor of having labor unions on her side.
Siding with one-time member |
BECAUSE
UNIONS DO have the ability to get their members to turn out and actually cast
ballots in accordance with the desires of union leadership.
If
that one poll commissioned by Stand by Children Illinois that shows Lori Lightfoot
with a 2-1 vote ratio in her favor really has any truth to it, then Preckwinkle
really is going to need every bit of organized labor support if she’s to have
the least bit of a chance to have victory in the April 2 run-off election.
Which
is why Camp Preckwinkle surely was disappointed to learn this week that the Chicago
Federation of Labor – the organization that oversees so many union locals – has
decided to remain neutral.
The
union leadership may well be taking the honest attitude – one that says their
interviews with the two mayoral candidates have such similar views and
attitudes on issues related to workers and labor that they can’t pick between
the two.
PRECKWINKLE: Her labor backing unsure |
ANYBODY
WHO THINKS there’d be a serious difference between a Mayor Lightfoot and a
Mayor Preckwinkle is exaggerating the fact.
Although
it seems that the labor unions that backed the campaign of Susana Mendoza
during the first phase of the municipal election cycle are basing their endorsement
decisions on the fact that Preckwinkle focused much of her negative campaigning
against Susana.
Lightfoot
could get some union member support just based on the fact that they want to
spite Preckwinkle come April 2. And since the Preckwinkle campaign is basing
its hopes so heavily on a strong union member voter turnout, the lack of an
endorsement could result in enough voter apathy that could result in a Lightfoot
victory.
LIGHTFOOT: Uncertainty a plus for Lori? |
Perhaps
even enough that justify the idea that Lightfoot is leading Preckwinkle by a 58
percent to 30 percent margin.
SO
I’M SURE that Preckwinkle is determined to exaggerate the significance of one
union that seems willing to stand by her side – as in the Chicago Teachers
Union. Which remembers that back in the days before she became a political
person, Toni was a school teacher.
The
union issued its own statement saying that the 2-1 voter ratio support for
Lightfoot was “stupid.” They were quick to recall that Stand by Children was a
group that supported efforts back in 2011 to raise the standards by which the
teachers’ union could go on strike.
As
they see it, the group was nothing more than an organization promoting the
anti-labor beliefs of Bruce Rauner – who we all know later went on to his one
term as Illinois governor, where he tried imposing his anti-union agenda on all
of us only to have the voters reject his re-election bid last year.
Should
we disregard the idea that Lori Lightfoot has such a huge lead, or that people
are that opposed to the idea of a “Mayor Preckwinkle?” Personally, I think the
number of people surveyed for the poll (only about 400) is too small to reach a
serious conclusion about anything.
BUT
IT WOULD seem that Preckwinkle has at least the teachers’ union remaining on
her side. Although, to be truthful, it’s not unusual for the teachers’ union
and other unions to be in disagreement with each other.
Will Preckwinkle move from left to right side of bldg. following Election Day? |
Although
the idea that Preckwinkle has the more liberal union members potentially on her
side would fit in with the Preckwinkle campaign strategy of convincing voters
that she, and not Lightfoot, is the true progressive for people to pick from
come Election Day.
Which
is a stance she would not have had to think of taking if the
originally-expected scenario of a run-off election between Preckwinkle and William
Daley were reality.
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment