What kind of content will fill news boxes of the future? |
INSTEAD,
MANAGEMENT CONCEDES a majority of their reporters are banded together, and they
will have to work out some sort of contract with them to define terms of
employment and conditions and other items of interest.
Which,
of course, is the real significant point.
In these
times where too many companies that have to deal with unions go out of their
way to play hardball in negotiations, it is a tactic I would not be surprised
to see take place with the Tribune – given its strong, anti-union history of
existence.
How long
will it take for contract talks to even begin. How quickly will things get
stalled. How many months will it take before we have an impasse. Will we
someday see Tribune-types picketing that new building they’re moving into this
summer – what with the Tribune Tower having been sold off from out under the
paper to provide the broadcast division additional revenue?
I’M OLD
ENOUGH to remember the 1980s when the Tribune undermined the unions that
represented their pressmen, and I also remember the creation of new positions
that were union-exempt to deal with the striking workers -- who basically never recovered their former strength.
Is that
what could be put forth for the editorial side? Perhaps create a new class of
reporter-type people who would do significant amounts of work, while strictly
limiting the job classifications that would be covered by the contract.
I don’t
doubt there are many younger people with editorial aspirations who’d think
nothing of taking such jobs. My own drawback on the job market these days is
that I expect to be compensated fairly for my work – which I’m sure is perceived
as a hostile act toward some corporate financial bottom line.
In
short, I’m happy for those reporter-types who feel a sense of victory in
gaining union recognition without much of a fight. But it also means management
will be fully armed (and ammo’ed) for the contract negotiation “war” that is
forthcoming.
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment