KENNEDY: Wants Pritzker out |
Perhaps it’s
the fact that the nearly year-long time period during which they’ve been
campaigning is making them feel touched in the head. They’re spewing silliness.
HOW ELSE
TO explain Chris Kennedy’s rant Thursday that he thinks J.B. Pritzker, whom
various polls have shown to be the front-runner, of sorts, for the Democratic
gubernatorial nomination should withdraw from the race.
To which
Daniel Biss, the state senator from Evanston who’d like to think he can play
politics with the big boys, says Kennedy has no business making such a demand.
He thinks both Kennedy and Pritzker ought to step aside to allow him to have
the gubernatorial nomination.
I found
one anonymous commenter on the Internet who says that Pritzker missed the
perfect chance to complete the circle by issuing a statement calling for Biss
to back away.
Although
my reaction is to wonder if Tio Hardiman, the gun control activist who has a
primary interest in the level of urban violence we’re confronted with in
society, thinks everybody ought to get out of the race so that he might have a
chance to win.
HARDIMAN
IS THE guy whom the same gubernatorial polls show with about 1 percent support.
That is, on the occasions when they even bother acknowledging his existence on
the political scene.
PRITZKER: Trying to stay above fray |
I did
think of making a joke about Robert Marshall being the candidate who wanted
everybody else to clear a path to victory for himself. But even that thought
was just a tad too ridiculous.
I
suspect if Marshall were to become the Democratic nominee for governor, that
would drive swarms of people over to an effort to create a third political
party, something along the lines of the 1986 election cycle when Adlai
Stevenson III had to run a third-party campaign to try to fulfill his
gubernatorial dreams.
Because
Marshall just ain’t a Democrat, no matter what papers he filed in order to run
in the primary.
BISS: Wants Kennedy/Pritzker out |
I TAKE
SUCH a light-hearted view on this issue, because I don’t expect anybody would
seriously consider dropping out of the race for the benefit of someone whom
they’ve been bad-mouthing for several months now as being totally unfit to
serve.
But the
fact that anybody would spew such rhetoric in any way other than as a tacky
joke meant to be heard only by their hard-core supporters means, to me, that
the wear-and-tear of the election cycle is getting to them.
Not that
I can’t sympathize. As a reporter-type person, I have covered the day-to-day
grind of a political campaign. I’ve been watching this election cycle from a
distance, but it is still tiring.
Personally,
I can’t wait for Tuesday night to come and go, and the unofficial election
results to become public. I’ll be grateful for a time when I don’t even have to
contemplate Marshall’s existence, at least until his next token campaign for
office in 2020.
HARDIMAN: Could he win if everybody dropped out? |
AND FOR
A time when two out of the three of Biss, Kennedy and Pritzker will become
ancient history. I’m sure the candidates are awaiting a rest period once the
primary cycle is complete.
So what
should we think of Kennedy saying, “If (Pritzker) believed in public service
and sacrifice, he would sacrifice his own political career in service to the
Democratic Party of Illinois and, frankly, to the people of Illinois by
dropping out of the race.”
Or Biss
saying, “Chris Kennedy and J.B. Pritzker are two sides of the same gold coin.”
If
Kennedy and Pritzker are “gold coins,” does that make Biss a Lincoln-head penny
of the sort that I have far too many of in my pants pocket’s spare change?
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment