Are Durbin and Duckworth (below) ... |
While I understand why they would engage in partisan politics on this issue (I don’t expect them to come to the defense of a Democrat), I can’t help but think of the tactic as one that reeks of absurdity.
... really obligated to give back anything? |
HEARING
REPUBLICANS ARGUE that Sens. Richard Durbin and Tammy Duckworth, both Illinois
Democrats, are obligated to get rid of any money that was raised for their
campaigns through Franken’s celebrity status is just ridiculous.
Hearing
them say the two should give it back is as ridiculous as a year ago when they
were constantly getting themselves all worked up in frenzied chants of “Lock
her up!” whenever the name of then-presidential candidate Hillary Clinton came
up.
About
the only thing those chants really accomplished was angering the segment of the
electorate not disposed to back Donald Trump’s presidential dreams – to the
point where Trump had better hope he never actually gets caught doing anything
illegal.
FRANKEN: Is he really Moore's equal? |
Because
you just know there will be some people inclined to show up at a future Trump
sentencing and chant “Lock Him Up!” at the moment punishment is imposed.
BUT
THAT SEEMS to be the way the Republicans think these days – even the ones in
Illinois who like to think they’re not quite as extreme as the Trump mentality,
but would have withered away into insignificance if not for the personal money
of Gov. Bruce Rauner.
Is Moore really as believable ... |
Which
often makes me think I should clarify in copy that the “R” following the name
of GOP elected officials ought to stand for Rauner Party, rather than
Republican Party.
So
what’s the latest issue that’s getting the Illinois Rauner Party (I’m sure
seeing what happened to the entity once thought of as the “Party of Lincoln” would
make Honest Abe roll over in his grave more than anything that Rod Blagojevich
ever did) soiling their drawers?
... as Trump would have us think he is? |
It’s
the fact that Franken is not a standard issue elected official. He has a
certain celebrity status that he has used to help his colleagues in politics
raise money to support their campaigns.
SEVERAL
OFFICIALS HAVE to admit to having received contributions from Franken – who now
has a couple of women claiming he behaved in a manner that was probably worthy
of the response of a slap across the face.
In
the case of Durbin, who has been a D.C. public official from Illinois for
30-plus years, it comes to $21,000. Which isn’t the largest amount in the
world. Although it’s tremendously huge compared to Duckworth, who only has
$5,000 to account for with Franken connections.
Neither
one of those amounts of money are huge. Yet that’s not the point of the
Republican actions.
It’s
a matter of distraction, trying to get people to think that Franken’s
heterosexual behavior is worse than any of the teenage girls that Moore is now
alleged to have been involved with back when he was in his early 30s (he’s now
70).
CLINTON: Will Hillary get last laugh? |
THEY’D
LIKE IT if people would focus attention on Franken, but would probably settle
for it if they would think of him as the Democratic Party equivalent of Moore.
Which
is just too ridiculous a claim to take seriously.
Now
as for Durbin or Duckworth giving back money (or actually, making charitable
contributions of an equal amount), I stand by my belief that doing so doesn’t
mean a thing. But here’s a thought – how about looking into the financial
records to see which people or groups are giving campaign money to Moore,
despite knowing of his proclivity for young girls?
Those
people are the ones whose political and moral judgments ought to be questioned.
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment