If signs like this really stirred up anti-pop tax attitudes, will their hostility carry over to hurt Toni Preckwinkle come 2018 Election Day? Photograph by Gregory Tejeda |
It creates the potential vote by the Cook County Board later this week of 12-5 (or maybe 13-4) in favor of an ordinance to rescind the penny-per-ounce on pop and other sweetened beverages. Which county board President Toni Preckwinkle will veto – but is a strong-enough vote to over-ride her – if it holds fast.
NOW
SOME PEOPLE are not considering this sufficient suffering for Preckwinkle. They’re
determined to stir up resentment at the polling place – getting enough people
to vote against her re-election bid next year because she had the nerve to
realize that the county has financial obligations that must be met.
PRECKWINKLE: Remains firm on pop tax |
People
in the real world don’t get to tell bill collectors we don’t have the money so
we’re not paying. In reality, we have to come up with the finances to meet our
obligations. We need to pay up!
Which
is why I have consistently thought (and still believe) that this pop tax that
adds about 20 cents to the bottle of Coca-Cola I occasionally buy is something we
all have to pay – if we really need to have those carbonated beverages in
supply.
It
also is why I’m not terribly sympathetic to the lobbying efforts of the
American Beverage Association – which represents the pop manufacturers who
probably don’t want anyone else managing to get a larger cut of the money paid
by people when they feel the need to buy pop.
THEY
WANT IT for themselves. Understandably, but not a high-minded cause by any
means.
OGILVIE: Insisted Ill. needed income tax |
The
trick is to see how, in coming months, this issue plays out. Will people really
hold a grudge against Preckwinkle – and carry out their revenge on Nov. 6, 2018
by voting ABP?
The
one thing that Toni has going in her favor is that as of now, the Anybody But
Preckwinkle vote literally has nobody else to pick. People who were contemplating
seeking the Democratic nomination for Cook County Board president have decided
not to do so. As for the Republicans, their political party may get bogged down
in the mass of anti-Trump and anti-Rauner rhetoric to put up a serious
challenger.
But
there are those people who can manage to get worked up at the “T” word just as
much as many ideologue-minded Republicans will get worked up at the “A” word
tying the governor to abortion.
Is there a 'Dan Walker' type for county? |
Ogilvie
(himself a former Cook County Board president who used that post as a
springboard to the Statehouse Scene) argued that the state’s finances had
become so unstable that the tax was necessary. Financial experts will argue
that the tax turned out to be essential.
Yet
there were enough people who voted against Ogilvie because of that tax that he
wound up losing re-election.
Could
governmental history repeat itself by stirring up enough people p-o’ed by the
thought of paying a few more pennies each time they buy pop (which is expected
to add up to a few million dollars to balance out the county budget)?
Daley name still influences our government |
As
I already stated, as of yet, there is not really a credible challenger to
Preckwinkle – although it’s always possible that there’s somebody currently out
there passing about nominating petitions to try to get on the ballot for the
March 20 primary.
But
could she wind up going into our local political history as the woman who
pushed for a tax to ensure that Cook County met its expenses – only to be
penalized at the polling place?
In
a world that could seriously elect Donald J. Trump as president with only 46
percent voter support, anything is possible.
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment