But
after learning of one-time Chicago Bears tight end and head coach Mike Ditka’s
latest railing on national television, I can’t help but think that Ozzie is
nowhere near as absurd.
FOR
THE RECORD, Ditka (who led the Chicago Bears to their only Super Bowl victory
ever back in 1986) was on the Westwood One pregame show prior to the Monday
Night Football game featuring the Bears against the Minnesota Vikings felt
compelled to ignore the questions about the Bears’ ongoing struggles to find a
competent quarterback.
Instead,
he wanted to rant about the fact that many professional football players feel
compelled to SUPPORT the protests taking place in recent weeks during the
National Anthem rituals that take place prior to pro football games.
Those
protests started last year with one player trying to express his concern about
harassment of individuals based on race. When President Donald Trump felt compelled
to get involved in this issue with his nonsense talk about “firing” football
players, those players started showing solidarity with their colleague.
Ditka
made a point of saying he’d “bench” anybody who dared do such things on any
team he coaches. But the part that gets the national attention was Ditka’s
claim that, “There has been no oppression in the last 100 years that I know of,”
adding later, “I don’t see all the social injustice that some of these people
see.”
IT’S NOT SURPRISING to learn that a professional athlete lives his life in a cocoon that isolates himself from the daily realities of our existence. I also don’t doubt these guys think their physical skills in playing a ballgame at a high level somehow makes them worthy of living life in such isolation.
He
may be the guy who doesn’t read the papers, except for the sports section so he
can know which sportswriter to complain about for writing something he chooses
not to agree with.
But
it would be an exaggeration to say we haven’t had oppression in the past 50
years – although at least now the law is such that the people who try to pull
off the most extreme instances can be prosecuted, rather than thinking the law
is on their side.
Or maybe Ditka is just one of those types who thinks that certain people are supposed to accept the fact that they’re entitled to receive a certain level of harassment from society as a large?
I
THINK THIS puts Ditka in a comparable category with Guillen, who led the White
Sox to a World Series title back in 2005 – a moment that for some Chicago
sports fans is more significant than that Bears Super Bowl title.
Remember
all the loudmouth incidents when Ozzie played for, and managed, Chicago. Like Ditka,
Guillen later got a one-year stint managing/coaching elsewhere (Miami for
Ozzie, New Orleans for Ditka) and now is to the point where his only sporting
value is as an occasional commentator for broadcasts.
Sports
fans in Miami still haven’t forgiven Ozzie for his saying all those years ago
that he actually had a certain level of respect for Fidel Castro – which I’m
sure they feel is as absurd as Ditka trying to claim that no one has been
oppressed in this nation. Personally, I always thought of Fidel as more of a third-rate, petty tyrant than a true world threat.
Just
because many of the individuals who are oppressed belong to groups whom Ditka and people
like him would prefer not to have to acknowledge. Which is the truly offensive part of all this cheap talk.
... the highs, and lows, they would reach |
It
makes me wonder if Ditka is now material for Saturday Night Live – the show
where he once was idolized in those “Super Fans” sketches. Would those same
fans now ponder whether Ditka has gone goofy in his old age?
Just
like some are pondering whether Guillen has lost it in his middle age, to the
point where the most recent report I saw about Ozzie was speculating whether he’d
be considered for the Detroit Tigers managing job that is now open.
He’s
not in line for it, no more than any team would seriously want Ditka hanging
around their sidelines during game time. A sad ending for two of the most
intriguing ballplayers-turned-coaches to be a part of the Chicago sports scene
in our lifetimes.
-30-
EDITOR'S NOTE: One major Ditka/Guillen difference -- Ditka is a member of the Pro Football Hall of Fame, whereas few people took seriously Guillen for the Baseball Hall of Fame the one year he was actually on the ballot. Which most likely is evidence that the baseball version in Cooperstown, N.Y., deserves more credibility than the football version in Canton, Ohio.
EDITOR'S NOTE: One major Ditka/Guillen difference -- Ditka is a member of the Pro Football Hall of Fame, whereas few people took seriously Guillen for the Baseball Hall of Fame the one year he was actually on the ballot. Which most likely is evidence that the baseball version in Cooperstown, N.Y., deserves more credibility than the football version in Canton, Ohio.
No comments:
Post a Comment