Weinstein still has his Oscar |
The
reports are coming out about how Weinstein has treated various women –
including many who appeared in the films he produced. We may hear in coming
days of more and more actresses willing to admit publicly of things they were
pressured to do for Weinstein’s gratification.
BUT
THERE’S ANOTHER thing we’re going to see a lot of in coming days – political people
trying to rewrite history in ways that would make it appear they never relied
on Weinstein’s financial support to get themselves elected to office.
For
Weinstein throughout the years has been one of the big-money interests who has
supported Democratic Party candidates for high-ranking office across the
nation. It was supposed to be evidence that Weinstein was a “progressive-minded”
guy with high-minded ideals on many social issues.
Now,
we have many political people checking their campaign finance records to see
how much money they ever received from Weinstein – and are now going out of
their way to publicly make charitable contributions of their own for identical
amounts.
Just
a couple of examples include Mayor Rahm Emanuel and Sen. Richard Durbin, D-Ill.
– both of whom would like for us to believe they never took Weinstein’s money.
OBAMA: $61,900 |
WORKING
ON WOMANHOOD is a Chicago-based group that has received $10,900 from Emanuel,
and will get another $2,000 in the near future. The larger figure is the total
of two donations Weinstein made to Emanuel mayoral campaigns, while the $2,000
is for a donation Weinstein made to an Emanuel congressional campaign back in
2004.
The
Chicago Sun-Times also reported that $1,000 will be donated to the American Red
Cross by Durbin – an effort to erase the contribution Weinstein made back when
Durbin first ran for the U.S. Senate back in 1995.
Now
before anybody thinks I’m trying to single out Emanuel or Durbin for abuse,
keep in mind that I realize this is a common tactic by political people who
certainly don’t want to be tainted by their ties to someone who later turns out
to be scummy in nature.
EMANUEL: $12,900 |
There
have been many charitable organizations used by government officials to try to
erase their potential sins-by-association. I’m sure the organizations were able
to put the money to good use.
BUT
JUST AS I always thought right-wing idiots who wind up taking money from white
supremacists or other leeches on our society shouldn’t be able to erase their
stain so easily, I’m not sure that anybody should be so quick to dismiss the
Weinstein affair.
What
we really need is an honest accounting of his behavior and efforts to try to
raise the level of conduct in our society so that we stop harassing women just
because. Merely giving up some money that came from campaign contributions
seems like a lazy effort to make the problem “go away” without doing anything
to make it actually go away.
DURBIN: $1,000 |
Besides,
my own gut feeling is that the money donated to campaigns by Weinstein
certainly got spent years ago. Trying to give it away now doesn’t erase the
fact that there was a Weinstein impact to the past elections.
It
seems like a lazy response to a very real problem.
WHAT
WE NEED is for people to speak out with more than their campaign wallets. Take
former President Barack Obama (whose own presidential re-election campaign of
2012 received over $61,000 in Weinstein donations) – he and one-time first lady
Michelle issued their statement denouncing Weinstein’s behavior and saying, “We
should celebrate the courage of women who have come forward to tell these
painful stories.”
TRUMP: Saying as little as possible about issue |
Which
stands out compared to the thoughts expressed on behalf of our current
president. Donald J. Trump admitted recently that he knew Weinstein personally,
and was “not at all surprised” to hear such stories.
Of
course, Trump himself probably can’t go farther in being critical of Weinstein
because there are many tales out there of pre-presidential Trump behaving in a
boorish manner – many of which he told about himself throughout the years
during appearances with broadcaster Howard Stern.
Which
is just as much a problem as those elected officials who think they can make a
perception problem go away by “returning” money they really spent years ago.
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment