Tyshawn
is the 9-year-old whose shooting death on Nov. 2 in the Auburn Gresham neighborhood
(also the home base of Michael Pfleger, the priest some people want to dismiss
as just a loudmouth, even though he has a tendency to speak the ugly truth) has
gained national attention because police believe it is a gang-related killing.
NOT
THAT TYSHAWN is regarded as a gang member or someone being used by the gangs to
do their illegal bidding. But it seems that Tyshawn’s father IS considered to
be a gang member who had managed to offend the sensibilities of another gang.
So
to gain their sense of retribution against dear ol’ dad, the rival gang took it
out on the kid.
Various
news reports say Tyshawn was lured into an alley near Damen Avenue at 80th
Street, then was viciously gunned down.
This
isn’t the usual case of a kid being killed in gang activity because he (or she)
happened to get caught up in the crossfire, or got hit by a stray bullet.
Instead, he was targeted.
THE
OLD SENSIBILITY that somehow, some people on the periphery of gang activity are
safe from its violence has gone out the window. Then again, that same sensibility
died with regards to organized crime so long ago.
Why
should these circumstances be any different?
Although
what catches my attention is the idea that people aren’t all that offended by a
child’s death.
In
fact, there are those who seem determined to want to use this incident as a way
of blaming inner-city residents for their own conditions. As though somehow
they bring it upon themselves just by being themselves. Which I want to dismiss
as nonsense.
THERE
ARE THOSE people who seem to want to play ideological games with the Chicago
homicide rate – perhaps so they can avoid having to think about coming up with
ways to reduce all the bloodshed that we are seeing in Chicago.
I
have read many anonymous Internet rants along the line of how the locals don’t
care that a kid was killed. They aren’t doing much to help the police, we’re
being told.
There
also is a sense of the “don’t snitch” mentality that runs through certain
neighborhoods where the local police presence is perceived as interfering with the
protection of the general public.
So
the fact that some people aren’t eager to “rat out” which local gang members
may have actually done this particular shooting isn’t shocking. Maybe there are
some who think the appropriate sense of justice is for the “dad” to take the
law into his own hands.
NOT
THAT I’M touting the vigilante mentality. If anything, that is too much like
the dreamy vision that those conservative ideologues would tout – the “wild
West” where everybody packs a pistol and “deals” with their own problems.
We
have a mess in segments of our society when there are people who have no faith
in our institutions to offer them protection. Instead of blaming the people for
having no faith, perhaps we ought to try to figure out how we can encourage
those people to think that society at-large cares about them in the least.
Then,
perhaps we’d get people willing to rise up in anger and take legitimate action
to deal with those people who think a 9-year-old vicious shooting is somehow
justified retaliation against a father.
Who
in all likelihood was not anybody whose actions toward his son were ever going
to win him a “Father of the Year” award!
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment