Too overactive? |
I
got ticketed, and actually showed up in court about a month later – only to get
one of the biggest breaks I ever got in my life.
FOR
IT SEEMS that the officers in question who pulled me over had issued a few
tickets that night whose legitimacy was questionable.
What
wound up happening was that the state’s attorney’s office had to dismiss the
charges against every single person who got a ticket on that particular night.
Including
myself. My wrong-way on a one-way street wound up being tossed. The court clerk
in that courtroom handed me back my driver’s license and I didn’t have to pay
any fine.
I
still recall the look of disgust on the face of the assistant state’s attorney
in that courtroom, knowing she was going to have to repeat the same drill for
so many cases because of a cop screw-up.
I
WONDER IF she’d feel just as appalled at the Chicago Tribune report on
Wednesday that said the video cameras erected at Chicago intersections to catch
traffic scofflaws had managed to screw up, and that some $2.4 million in fines
were not valid.
I’m
sure there’s somebody within municipal government who had already spent that
money, and is now desperately trying to figure out how to make up the lost
revenue.
It
seems the problem lies with cameras that were still active, recording traffic
activity and issuing citations, even after hours when they were supposed to be
turned off.
For
it seems some of those locations only had restricted traffic flow at certain
times of the day. Or in other cases, signs warning people of parking or traffic
restrictions were written or erected in such a confusing manner that it could
be argued that motorists really didn’t know they were doing something improper.
I’M
SURE THERE are some people out there who are dismissing this as a petty flaw.
There probably are some people outraged that I got away with driving for
half-a-block the wrong way on a one-way street.
But
it really does come down to that legal principle that we hold our law
enforcement officials to a higher standard and will not allow flawed cases to
proceed.
These
improperly-operating cameras can’t be allowed to take over and impose all these
citations upon us – even though I’m very sure the big reason for having those
cameras is to catch as many violations as possible as a municipal revenue
source.
The
fact that catching those offenses might make our streets more safe for the
public is probably a secondary concern.
ALTHOUGH
I HAVE to confess that reading the Tribune report about all those tickets being
tossed out and the revenue lost amused me in the same way that watching television
re-runs of “Hill Street Blues” does.
How
many times did the officers of the Hill Street station in that Chicago-like
city (even though the real-life Maxwell Street station’s outside was used in
select scenes) do some minor gaffe that wound up resulting in their whole case
being thrown out?
Usually
with the voluptuous public defender Joyce Davenport delivering the lethal legal
blow; leaving her boyfriend-turned-husband Captain Furillo as frustrated as
anybody else!
Think
of these flawed cameras as the 21st Century equivalent of a police
gaffe, and we have to wonder how little some things change at all.
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment