FIORINA: The winner? |
Although
after reading and watching the news accounts from those entities who felt the
need to see the supposedly-top presidential dreamers stand in front of “Air
Force One” (the closest most of them will ever get to that aircraft), I don’t
think I missed much by waiting until Thursday morning to know what was said.
AND
I ALSO don’t think anyone who bothered to watch it live is any better informed
about its significance – unless they really needed to pretend that they were
there to see it all happen.
My
own quirk is that after having covered many political debates (including some
that involved presidential prospects), they all seem alike.
So
what’s the real point here? I still think this field is overly-broad, and that
most of the people who blathered on and on will not be a factor next year when
people are actually asked to cast ballots for who will get the right to be the
next president come January 2017.
The
overview I have heard from many is that former CEO Carly Fiorina somehow showed
herself to be the most credible persona of the Republican presidential batch.
THAT
MAY WELL be true, although I’d say the reason she stands out is that the rest
of the batch is so mediocre – past political failures who are trying again, or
people whose only qualification to be the nation’s chief executive is their own
over-bloated ego.
BUSH: He's sorry |
And
as for the fact that the so-called most-tweeted moment was former Florida Gov.
Jeb Bush’s apology to his mother for having smoked marijuana when he was young?
It
was probably a more honest moment than Bill Clinton back in 1992 when he said
he smoked, but “didn’t inhale.” Which all these decades later, I still don’t
know what he thinks the difference is.
All
in all, not the most enlightening of shows.
THE
KEY, OF course, is Donald Trump, whose money and bluster enabled him to take
large early leads – with some of the candidates coming in so low they barely
register.
TRUMP: Will he still be relevant tomorrow? |
Although
it is interesting that the neurologist, Ben Carson, has had recent polls
showing he is running neck-and-neck with Trump. It could be that about half of those
who have an opinion back either of those two.
Evidence
that the Republican hard-core wants a new name – no matter how much that person
may not have a clue about what is actually involved in being president. It’s
not all about having a personal jet plane to fly around on, and you don’t get
to “bark” orders to Congress.
Just
think how much happier Barack Obama would be if he could have told Congress
what he wanted, and they would have been obligated to obey.
BUT
THE MOST truthful thing I may have read in recent days was a poll in the
Washington Post – 27 percent of people actually have an opinion about who
should be president. It’s still early. We’re more than a year away from the
general election.
The
serious people will probably start giving all this a thought come January.
Everything we’re reading or hearing these days is going to be so irrelevant by
the time it matters. Don’t forget that Rick Perry, the former Texas governor,
has already dropped out (his second presidential failure). More and more will
fall to the wayside in coming weeks and months.
Would you mess with the U.S. if this man was present? |
Which
is why I didn’t feel compelled to watch on Wednesday. The re-run of “Hill Street Blues” that I
watched was more entertaining than learning that Trump tried to back away from
his past sexist trash-talk about Fiorina.
I
say “Capt. Furillo” for president ("Joyce Davenport" for first lady), with “Mick Belker” ("Grrrrrrr!!!!!") as his
personal enforcer. It makes as much sense as any of the people who are really
in the running.
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment