Chicago will always have edge over Houston |
The
one-time Second City (only to New York) will someday have to settle for Number
Four – and most likely sometime during our lifetimes.
REUTERS
REPORTED THAT by the year 2025, Chicago’s population (currently about 2.7
million) will be 2.5 million. Whereas Houston (which in 2010 had 2.1 million
people) will be about 2.54 million people.
It
will go New York City, Los Angeles, Houston THEN Chicago. Which on a certain
level makes me want to wretch.
Not
that it really makes any difference. I wouldn’t want to live in any Texas city,
and certainly wouldn’t think of Houston as being superior to Chicago on any
level. Just as I don’t really think of Los Angeles as superior to Chicago just
because back when I was in college it managed to surpass Chicago in population.
Although
I can already hear the Texas-type boasts (that always come across as insecurity
at its worst) about how wonderful this makes Houston – except for those people
from Dallas, who will probably be more appalled by this news than anyone from
Chicago will be.
OF
COURSE, THERE is a factor in all of this growth that explains how a
southwestern city could possibly be larger than Chicago, or any Midwestern U.S.
city.
Space!
A bi-state region with that big huge lake ... |
Houston
has space surrounding it. Room for it to grow that can be incorporated into the
city proper. Evidence that it is located in a region that could accurately be
described as the middle of nowhere (just like Las Vegas, Nev.).
Whereas
Chicago has been hemmed in on all sides by Lake Michigan to the east (an asset
that I’m sure Houston would kill to have) and suburban communities in all
directions.
THERE’S
NO SPACE for Chicago proper to grow. There is room on the outskirts for the
suburban area to continue to grow. In fact, metropolitan Chicago is getting
larger even though the city proper is shrinking.
... will always be superior to city in the desert |
The
Census Bureau indicates that back in 2010, Houston and its suburbs have some
5.95 million people. By comparison to Chicago, which the Census Bureau offered
an estimate of having some 9.73 million people in 2011.
I
don’t doubt that Houston’s suburbs will get larger and the gap will close.
But
it’s very likely that come 2025, Houston’s city population will be slightly
larger while Chicago’s metro area population will remain significantly larger. I
can already hear the arguments that will arise, particularly from Texas-types
who will resent the idea that anybody challenges their claim to being Number
Three when you could argue they remain Number Four!
WHICH
WILL MEAN that Chicago will have to settle for being the largest city in the Midwest
or Great Lakes regions – because it’s not like St. Louis, Milwaukee, Detroit or
Minneapolis/St. Paul are on the verge of surpassing Chicago anytime soon (if
ever).
Now
I don’t want to come across as mocking Reuters. Although I’m not sure why this
is news now. Estimates that Houston will someday have more people have been
spreading around for years now.
Just
as it was long expected that Los Angeles would surpass Chicago by the time it
actually happened in 1984 (New York is so much bigger than anything else that
nothing is likely to surpass it anytime soon).
These
population shifts don’t change the true character of either city, or the fact
that in a Chicago vs. Houston brawl, our city will be able to claim a World
Series advantage – our White Sox did sweep the Houston Astros four straight
games back in ’05. Nothing changes that!
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment