BUSH: The front-runner? |
With
17 people on the GOP side officially expressing delusions of someday becoming
U.S. president, Fox has said it will allow only 10 to be included.
THOSE
10 WILL be the ones who rank on top in an average of five polls. Which could
result in some people who might theoretically deserve a review being excluded
from inclusion.
Which
will result in the public perception that they’re not really in the campaign.
Considering
that several polls are showing the real estate magnate Donald Trump at the top
of most polls, he’ll probably wind up getting one of those spots. There are
those who feel he’s taking a spot away from a more qualified person.
Personally,
I think any campaign Trump winds up running will be as a political independent –
that way he can make it all about himself and not have to put up with political
operatives telling him he doesn’t have a clue what he’s talking about.
BECAUSE
‘THE DONALD’ doesn’t take such insolence lightly!
For
what it’s worth, it doesn’t surprise me to learn that a broadcast-mentality
would not think it worthwhile to have every single candidate in their debate
program.
FIORINA: The legitimate business exec |
I
still remember back in the days when I was a reporter-type person in
Springfield, Ill., and a local TV type told me it was irresponsible to have all
the candidates in a debate. Weeding out the fringe candidates who have no
chance of winning a primary is part of the job, I was told.
I
believe that if a candidate gets on the ballot, they deserve to be included –
so that their stupid comments can shoot them down in the minds of the
electorate and cause them to lose.
GRAHAM: The political pro |
BUT
AT THIS stage, we don’t have anyone on a ballot. It is still that early. I’m
figuring that Fox thinks it will be impossible to include 17 people and give
them all time to say anything significant.
Although
I wonder if even 10 candidates creates that situation. I doubt we’re going to
learn much about anyone, particularly since the focus now is on Trump and how
the others will counter him.
RUBIO: The Cuban w/o Latino support |
Trump’s
money allows him to buy public perception, particularly since the story line
being pushed is if any of the other candidates can boost themselves up to the
Trump level in the election cycle.
The
only reason I don’t get too bothered is because I’m realistic enough to know
that most of the candidates who don’t get included in the Thursday debate will
likely have faded out and be long-forgotten by Election Day.
HECK,
EVEN MANY of the ones who make the debate (we’ll be told Tuesday night which
ones will be included) will not actually be on the ballot come Nov. xx, 2016.
CHRISTIE: Noo Yawker for those who hate N.Y. |
At
this stage, a debate is more about comic relief – as Saturday Night Live once
phrased it, a presidential debate is a “chance to avoid saying something
stupid.” Thursday’s program is not about educating the electorate about
candidates.
It’s
more about making people think that the Fox News Channel is at the heart of the
campaign action, and that we ought to pay mind to their political spin when
deciding what to believe.
Besides,
I can already hear the rants about the proposed CNN debate (which says they
will split the program into two so they can include all 17 people) – all the
people who get put into the program without Trump will complain that they’re on
the political “B” team.
-30-
WALKER: Campaign has $5M in Ricketts family cash |
EDITOR’S
NOTE: Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush. Neurosurgeon Ben Carson. New Jersey Gov. Chris
Christie. Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas. Former Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina. Former
Virginia Gov. Jim Gilmore. Sen. Lindsay Graham, R-S.C. Former Arkansas Gov.
Mike Huckabee. Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal. Former Ohio Gov. John Kasich. Former
New York Gov. George Pataki. Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky. Former Texas Gov. Rick
Perry. Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla. Former Sen. Rick Santorum, R-Penn. Real estate developer Donald Trump. Wisconsin
Gov. Scott Walker. The photographs used here are the ones I think are worthy of
consideration. Not that I'd be inclined to vote for any of them.
No comments:
Post a Comment