BLAGOJEVICH: Yet another legal appeal |
Or
at least the version of the French king that was portrayed by Mel Brooks in “History
of the World, Part I.”
THE
GUY WHO behaved in whatever a manner his whim felt appropriate, constantly
telling us, “It’s good to be the king.”
Judges
base their decisions on the law, but are given the authority to make their
interpretations based on what they think the law means. That is the Democratic
way – they serve as a check on political people who exceed their authority.
So
it shouldn’t be a surprise that the nine justices who comprise the Court of
Appeals in Chicago (who oversee cases throughout the Midwestern U.S.) probably
won’t be all that enthused about the request made this week by former Gov. Rod
Blagojevich.
A
three-judge panel recently rejected many of the grounds upon which Blagojevich
was challenging his criminal convictions on multiple charges – the ones that
got him nearly a 14-year prison term out in Colorado.
BLAGOJEVICH
ASKED FOR the entire appeals court to reconsider that ruling. Which makes sense
from Blagojevich’s point of view – he wants out of prison sooner rather than
later.
He’s
following the legal procedure, give the Court of Appeals a chance to reconsider
before he takes the matter to the Supreme Court of the United States.
Which
is probably less likely to take this case seriously than the Court of Appeals.
If judges are like Mel Brooks' King Louis XVI,... |
SO WHAT’S LIKELY to happen with Blagojevich’s request for a rehearing?
Blagojevich
is taking the viewpoint that the rules under which he was found guilty are so
strict that no political person could avoid conviction – unless they manage to
avoid the glare of a prosecutorial type.
... does that make Blagojevich just like Brooks' piss boy? |
Of
course, there are some people whose view of electoral politics is such that
they probably like the idea of everybody being put away behind bars – they’re
usually the type who can’t stand the idea of anybody’s ideas other than their
own being represented.
NOT
THAT I’M convinced Blagojevich’s appeal is going anywhere. Because judges by
nature have that “It’s good to be the King” mentality to them.
They’re
not required to rule on the merits of Blagojevich’s request. They could just as
easily issue a brief statement saying “no” and leave it at that. They certainly
don’t have to explain why they don’t think this case is worth reconsidering.
And
the chance that Blagojevich can convince a majority of the full Court of
Appeals? It’s a long-shot. I don’t know that the bulk of the justices are
willing to suddenly think that Milorod is a victim – when the reality is that
the bulk of society is more than willing to wish that Blagojevich get the
harshest of penalties possible (and is upset that the judicial panel went so
far as to strike down five of the charges for which he was found guilty).
But
then again, the best stories are the ones that come totally out of left field –
so unexpected that everyone’s initial reaction is silence! Then shock, and
anger. Furious anger!
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment