Will we soon see fliers like this on South Side? |
Yes,
the same Englewood that is one of the city’s lower-income neighborhoods – and often
is the focal point of much of the urban violence that ideological idiots would
have you think is taking place across all of Chicago.
THE
PEOPLE WHO like the idea see the fact that people who live in that area have to
go to some extremes in order to shop for groceries because of the fact that
there really isn’t a full-scale supermarket in the area.
Those
who hate the idea of Whole Foods say they don’t see the practicality of putting
a food retailer whose image is centered around getting the business of upscale
customers who want “elite” (allegedly) versions of products in a neighborhood
where there would be higher percentages than usual of people relying on LINK
cards.
Which,
by the way, Whole Foods officials made a point of saying this week that they DO
accept.
Personally,
I find the latter attitude to be just a bit snotty – almost as though they’re
saying certain people aren’t worthy of having a Whole Foods near them. These
are the ones who’d rather have the Food4Less chain (an offshoot of the Kroger
Co.), because it better fits their image of what Englewood “deserves.”
NONETHELESS,
I’M SKEPTICAL over whether Whole Foods will gain much in the way of customer
support when the store is finally built (right by the Kennedy-King College
campus).
I
actually live within a 10-minute drive of a Whole Foods store. Personally, it
strikes me as the place where I might go occasionally to pick up a few
specialty items if I’m planning to make a special dish or two.
They
also do have some vegetable items in their produce section that aren’t readily
stocked in the Jewel Foods store that is located one block from where I live.
But
I can’t help but think that anybody who does all of their grocery shopping at a
Whole Foods is someone so pretentious about themselves and wanting to buy into
the store’s upscale image. They definitely have too much money to waste.
PERSONALLY,
I WONDER what Whole Foods is getting out of the deal?
Although
I couldn’t help but notice the Chicago Sun-Times story Thursday about the $10
million subsidy city government will provide Whole Foods to help prepare the
site for store construction.
Municipal
governments routinely offer up such deals to businesses of any size that want
to locate within their boundaries. In and of itself, the subsidy isn’t unusual.
But
it makes me wonder if the developers who are bringing Whole Foods to the
Englewood neighborhood are counting on some sort of political good-will from
city officials.
BRING
THIS STORE to one of the city’s “food deserts” and help make it look as though
the Emanuel Administration is doing something to benefit the inner-city to make
it easier for its residents to shop for groceries (believe it or not, they eat
too).
In
return, it would seem that those developers can now call in a favor or two –
perhaps some easier approval for a future project that they will want to build
somewhere within Chicago.
So
what do I really think about the concept of Whole Foods coming to Englewood? It
would be nice if the store can help residents of that South Side neighborhood
get access to better food. Maybe it could even help bolster the surrounding
neighborhood.
But
the political cynic in me can’t help but wonder about that payback. What future
project will get greased through the system because of the Whole Foods
willingness? And how much of a stinker will that future deal be?
-30-
1 comment:
I think you pretty much sum up my opinion on this issue -- everything from some wariness of people who think Englewood deserves a Save-a-lot rather than a Whole Food, to the question of exactly how does this work.
The one thing I would add -- and I really hope that someone can get an answer -- is this: with $10mln of TIF money going to the project (more than just the Whole Foods), and the developer saying that the store will cost $3.5mln to build, did the Mayor just give a free store to Whole Food?
And with such a huge gift (and the resulting lower costs), is the business model for the Englewood Whole Food actually just a corporate welfare model? I mean, you get the store for free (or substantially below market), and then you apply for the various tax credits available for a business in a blighted area. It almost doesn't matter if the store makes an actual profit or not; the store is designed to produce tax credits and other government subsidies to that help the Whole chain (see the pun I did there?) have a healthier bottom line.
If that's the model, the next question is: is this the most efficient way to use government dollars to address food deserts? Or this is just another example of a corporate giveaway dressed up as a policy accomplishment?
Post a Comment