QUINN: Daring the Lege to override him |
For
our legislators get paid once a month, at the beginning of each calendar cycle.
So the action of Gov. Pat Quinn to refuse to pay legislators until they get off
their duffs and approve something resembling a reform of the pay
state-monitored pension programs are funded.
THERE
HAS BEEN speculation in recent weeks that the committee of legislators that is
trying to resolve the problem has some serious ideas.
We
may be headed in the right direction. Or maybe it’s just an illusion – the same
way that Chicago Cubs fans are delusional enough to think that their favorite
ball club actually is headed in the direction of being a pennant contender in
the near future.
Quinn,
himself, didn’t do much to ease the tensions that now exist.
On
Saturday, he defended his actions and said if the Legislature really hates the
idea of not being paid (they didn’t get an August check, and now they’re not
getting anything for September) they can go ahead and use their override power
to take down the amendatory veto he used to strike their salaries from the
state budget.
OF
COURSE, QUINN knows full well the Legislature is not likely to do that. They
don’t want the newspaper headline Legislature
restores own salaries while pension problem remains to be turning up all
over Illinois.
All
over the country actually, because this is just the kind of story that could be
spun by all the anti-government geeks into a government DEMANDING to be paid
for doing nothing.
Dueling pension plans ... |
That’s
not literally true. But this is a move by Quinn that resonates with the
populace, even if the electorate doesn’t think much of the governor himself.
The reality is that he gets away with it because the public thinks even less of
legislators than they do the governor.
All
of this, however, is mere trivia. What we ought to be focused on is the pension
question – the five programs overseen by Illinois state government that cover
the retirement benefits of assorted public service workers and public school
teachers outside of Chicago.
THE
FACT IS that state officials all too often resolved financial problems of the
past by short-changing the amount of money needed to fund the pension programs.
... from dueling leaders |
When
the state does that, it gets the same result as when you hold off on paying
your bills in a timely manner – the debt accumulates and at some point you have
to make an extra-large payment to get yourself caught up.
In
the case of Illinois state government, that payment is now about $6 billion –
which is about 20 percent of all the money the state will have to pay for all
its daily operations for the current fiscal year. In short, it isn’t going to
happen.
We
all saw how Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan and state Senate President
John Cullerton (both Chicago Democrats) came up with dueling plans, only to see
neither actually pass.
WE
NOW HAVE the legislative panel (with state Sen. Kwame Raoul, D-Chicago, as a member
who could use the results of this issue to propel himself to higher office in
the future) trying to come up with solutions.
There
is speculation that the cost of living adjustments to the pension payments
could be reduced for future years, but the state workers themselves would have
to pay 1 percent less as their contribution toward their eventual pensions.
Which
could be spun by officials as giving something to state workers (the reduction would
mean more money in the employee pockets right now), in exchange for a little
bit less come the future.
RAOUL: Pension problems jolt career |
THE KEY TO comprehending this issue, however, is to remember that nothing is definite. The legislators aren’t ready to recommend anything for approval, which means the General Assembly isn’t close to voting to send something to Quinn for his final action.
There’s
a good chance that nothing will be ready come Sept. 18 – the date when a
lawsuit filed by the legislative leaders to force payment of their salaries is
scheduled to come up again before Cook County Judge Neil Cohen.
In
fact, I won’t be surprised if there isn’t a resolution to this issue come Oct.
1 – which would mean a third month without pay. And more confusion about the
future – which our politicos always behave as though it won’t ever come if they
just ignore it long enough.
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment