ROBERTS: Unpredictable? |
Because
they have the potential to be so unpredictable.
THERE
WAS THE elder George Bush who gave the high court Justice David Souter (now
retired). Bush was among a series of Republican presidents who were determined
to load the court with conservative ideologues to ensure that certain policies
were kept in place – even if the American people made the “mistake” of voting them
out of office.
Souter’s
interpretation of the law became one that wound up infuriating those same
ideologues – who were more than willing to place blame on Bush, even if other
appointments he made to the high court (Clarence Thomas, anyone?!?) were, are
and always will be in line with their beliefs.
Now
let’s move to the present, where we have Chief Justice John Roberts – who got
his post from now-former President George Bush the younger.
Yet
Roberts wound up being the justice who swung away from a predicted ideological
leaning to give us the ruling that kept Barack Obama’s health care reform as
federal law – and ensured that all the efforts by Congress to abolish it will
be perceived as the leanings of ideological crackpots.
AND
ON TUESDAY, Roberts took some actions that are being interpreted by some as
ruining the desire of ideologues to have the high court knock down all this gay
marriage “nonsense” – at least that’s how they perceive it.
Tuesday
was the first of two days that the Supreme Court heard arguments concerning a
California measure known as Proposition 8 – an attempt to cut off efforts to
make marriage for gay couples legal by specifying that is most definitely
illegal.
SOUTER: Predictability predecessor? |
There
were some attorneys arguing on behalf of those ideologues. Yet Roberts publicly
questioned what legitimacy those people had in this legal proceeding. As though
perhaps he thought they ought to just “pipe down” and let the real attorneys
handle the legitimate issues involved in this case.
Admittedly,
this is just one moment in this particular legal battle. It may not turn out to
be a key point in this argument.
OR,
IT MIGHT be over-interpretation on the part of some people to try to put a
specific viewpoint into Roberts’ mind – and into creating a potential 5-4 vote
of justices to strike down Proposition 8.
Instead
of a 5-4 vote (Roberts, along with justices Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader
Ginsburg, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor) that upholds it. Although I suspect a real majority of the court wishes this issue were not before them, and they'd like to figure out a way to do as little as legally possible without appearing to be completely cowardly.
I’m
not about to predict what the Supreme Court will do in ruling on this
particular case – a ruling expected sometime in June. Legal issues at this
level are just too unpredictable.
Although
I’m pretty sure that if Roberts winds up being part of a Vote of 5 majority
that enables marriage for gay couples, he will be well on his way toward
demonization by the ideological right. Of course, those same ideologues will
find someone else to rant about. That’s what they’re good at!
HE’LL
PROBABLY BECOME more despised than Souter ever was. I wonder if he’d become
despised as much as Earl Warren – the justice whose court in the 1960s that
upheld much of the Civil Rights reforms wound up being the target of all those
billboards throughout the South.
Will we get 21st Century take on these billboards? |
“Impeach
John Roberts!!!” Most likely from the very same people who absolutely want to
believe that Obama wasn’t born in Honolulu back in 1961.
Some
people are just determined to complain. And a part of me suspects that the
reason they oppose gay marriage is because it gives legitimacy to another group
of people they would prefer to rant about – thereby showing all the more how
ridiculous their rants are.
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment