How much will structure change after renovation? |
There’s one inherent fact to comprehend when it comes to the way Chicago political people interact with the professional athletic teams that represent this city.
They
don’t want change!
THE
WHITE SOX will always be at 35th Street, while the Bulls and Blackhawks
(who’d have ever envisioned so many wins in this strike-shortened season?) will play their games on Madison
Street.
The
Bears will be in Soldier Field. While the Cubs will forevermore be the team
that plays at Clark and Addison streets.
Think
about it. The White Sox, Bulls and Blackhawks moved to new stadiums in the 1990s
that were located across the street from their old buildings – allowing for
minimal change in the way we think of those teams.
The
Bears play in that flying-saucer contraption located within the old Soldier
Field, no matter how hideous it makes the overall structure look.
SO
NOW THAT the Chicago Cubs are trying to engage in serious negotiations about a
renovation of their stadium so that the 99-year-old building will survive a few
more decades, the Cubs have the serious drawback in negotiations that they can’t
seriously play a threat to move.
Even
though I suspect some of their northwest suburban base of fans would probably
prefer it if they no longer had to make the trek to the Lake View neighborhood
and could instead go to a place like Arlington Heights or Schaumburg.
Of
course, that would go contrary to the trend of modern-day stadium building –
which comes up with structures that like to pretend they’re based on the
classic ballparks of old but are usually built on the fringes of downtown.
TUNNEY: Talking tough, because he can! |
But
we’ve never had that attitude in Chicago. When the White Sox tried back in the
1980s to talk of building a new stadium in DuPage County, or when others tried
to talk of a multi-purpose stadium for the White Sox and Bears in the South
Loop – they were non-starters!
THE
POLITICAL PEOPLE back then only wanted to talk about construction that would keep
a sports team at 35th Street near the Dan Ryan Expressway – as though
it is written in stone that the ball club can go nowhere else.
Even
though a modern facility probably would have fit in better at a different
location than it does on the fringes of the old-school Bridgeport neighborhood.
The
same attitude is going to prevail with the Cubs – which will limit the amount
of change that will be permitted to the structure to make it competitive with
the new stadiums that are overglorified shopping malls with sports themes, or
perhaps baseball-themed amusement parks.
Where
the game on the field is secondary to the whole spectacle of being present in
the building.
THE
RICKETTS FAMILY that now owns the Chicago Cubs wants to do a significant
overhaul of the old building, but city officials are making it clear they’re
not about to give in on much change.
Alderman
Thomas Tunney of the 44th Ward has said he wants assurances of more
parking (which Wrigley Field now notoriously lacks), better police protection
and guarantees that the renovated ballpark wouldn’t become an architectural albatross
that overwhelms the neighborhood – such as what U.S. Cellular Field sometimes
does to the Armour Square neighborhood.
And
Mayor Rahm Emanuel seems determined to treat the Cubs as he might have once
treated Republican politicos who were trying to undermine Barack Obama’s
presidential authority.
What
brought this thought into my mind was reading the assorted Internet comments
being posted. There are those who think the Cubs ought to tell the city to “Shove
it!” and move to a suburban location.
AS
THOUGH LIFE were that simple.
Particularly
since I suspect many suburban officials like the idea of having the amenities of
life’s entertainment nearby without having them within their own boundaries.
Because then, they’d be responsible for their maintenance.
It
may well be only Chicago city officials who would want to take on a project
such as a $300 million overhaul of Wrigley Field (with another alleged $200
million to upgrade the surrounding neighborhood).
Which
may well mean that Chicago gets the upper hand in these negotiations.
WHILE
I DON’T have a problem with professional sports teams playing in city- (or
state-)owned stadiums, I only wish these governments could negotiate worthwhile
deals that make it viable for them – as well as the teams!
Not
selling out the house to benefit the Cubs could well be a major accomplishment
for the Emanuel administration. Let’s only hope that city officials don’t
forget that fact.
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment