CLINTON: Would we like her as much if she had won? |
There’s a new poll out (commissioned by the
Washington Post and ABC News) that says 57 percent of all people surveyed would
like to see soon-to-be former Secretary of State Hillary R. Clinton run for
president come the 2016 election cycle.
IT’S NOT JUST that some people already are getting
excited about ’16 even though Barack Obama has yet to take the oath of office
to serve the four-year term to which he won re-election last month.
It’s more that I have vivid memory of when Hillary
Clinton was THE most reviled human being in the U.S. political scene – even more
so than husband (and president) Bill.
Heck, there were some people whose biggest objection
to Bill Clinton was that he didn’t put a muzzle on his wife!
Now, as Hillary Clinton plans to step down after
having served four years under President Obama as Secretary of State, it seems
that we can’t get enough of her.
THIS IS LARGELY a woman-driven thing. It would seem
we are long overdue to start taking women seriously as potential chief executives
of the U.S. government. And she is getting the credit for many of the
accomplishments that occurred during the first term of the Obama presidency.
Which is not a problem. She had a hand in many of
them. She deserves her praise.
But looking at the details of this poll, it would
seem the only people who still have their hang-ups about Hillary are white men
who identify with the Republican Party.
Only 13 percent of them like the idea of Hillary
Clinton running for president. But Republican (35 percent) and politically
independent (68 percent) women are willing to go along with the 84 percent of
women who are Democrats in saying they’d like to have Hillary as president.
IT MAY WELL be that Obama’s best action of his first
term was not to take personally all the pot-shots that the Clinton presidential
campaign directed his day during the 2008 primary. He picked her for possibly
the most important position (I know some will argue attorney general) of his
cabinet.
But what would have happened if Hillary Clinton had
won that Democratic primary?
What if she had gone on to clean John McCain’s clock
in the general election? What if we literally had spent the past four years
with William Jefferson Clinton as the nation’s first “first gentleman?”
You know very well that Hillary Clinton’s approval
rating (66 percent, according to the poll) wouldn’t be anywhere near that high.
SHE’D BE THE one lagging far down in the teens (or
maybe low 20s) when it comes to supporters. She’d be the one getting blamed for
everything that could possibly go wrong.
And you just know that Bill Clinton would have done
something that would have further infuriated all those people who devoted the
bulk of their lives in 1998 to trying to remove him from office through the
impeachment process.
The best thing that could have ever happened to the
Clintons on a personal level was not having to endure the hassle of actually
trying to run the country.
Because the bottom line is that we all have a
certain level to which we will give a knee-jerk reaction of blame in dealing
with any incumbent officials. It’s all their fault! Dump the fool so that we
can move on to blame their replacement.
SO EXCUSE ME if I don’t exactly take seriously the
idea of a poll being taken now that says the one-time Goldwater Girl from
suburban Park Ridge ought to be a presidential contender in four years.
All those people who are thinking we should have
voted for Clinton in 2008? If that had happened, they’d now be wondering how
much better off things would be if they had voted for that Obama guy four years
ago!
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment