Will people take a toke for Gov. Pritzker … |
Under
the new law, people ages 21 and over will be able to walk into
properly-licensed dispensaries and buy small amounts of marijuana or marijuana-laced
products for their own personal use.
THEY
WON’T EVEN have to put up the pretense of having glaucoma or some other medical
condition that would make marijuana use have a medicinal value.
Not
that it means there won’t still be issues involved with marijuana use. Those people
who want to view it as inherently a criminal act will still be able to get all
bent out-of-shape.
Because
the part of this new law that has always attracted my attention has been the
provision of a minimum age. That’s 21! Which is a concept that I find ever-so-incredibly
laughable.
Personally,
I recall people being around 11 when they first insisted on taking a toke.
Those inclined to want to be heavy users of marijuana usually were regularly
(or at least as often as they could afford it) consuming it by about 14 or 15.
DOES
ANYONE REALLY believe that people inclined to want to use the stuff really are
going to wait until they turn 21?
Somehow,
I suspect the age restriction is going to become one of the most-ignored laws
we’ll have on the books. Just like the laws that say people aren’t supposed to
have their first legal alcoholic drink until turning 21.
Will
people start regarding their 21st birthday as an excuse to not only
have their first “official” beer, but also their first smoke? Unless they find
quirks in the law – such as I did with regards to alcohol.
… when the clock strikes midnight on New Year's? |
For
my first legal beer came three days before I turned 21 – because I happened to
be in the District of Columbia at the time, and the drinking age there then was
18. So they regarded me as having been legal for years, rather than waiting
another three days before selling me that beer.
WHICH
ACTUALLY TURNED out to be a rather anticlimactic moment, to tell the truth.
That
could turn out to be a positive for marijuana use, to be truthful. Legalizing
the product would take away the stigma that would make many people think they
just HAVE to give it a try.
Or
maybe we’ve just increased the desire of 12-year-olds to want to take a smoke
to show how grown-up they are – even if all they’re really going to provide is
that they’re as ridiculous as those pre-teen girls who wear too much makeup, or
youthful boys who drown themselves in cheap cologne.
But
then again, the old laws (which still technically apply until Dec. 31) added to
the stigma of drug use to make many would-be adults behave like teenaged
halfwits at the very thought of getting high. Probably thinking they’re as entertaining
while impaired as Cheech and Chong at their 1970s peak.
PERSONALLY,
I’M NOT going to be inclined to rush out and get a legal stash, largely because
I find the habit of smoking anything to be grubby and stinky, if not outright
repulsive.
We're not all funny like Cheech & Chong |
But
I also don’t doubt that offending the political sensibilities of people who
wanted marijuana use criminalized because they liked the idea of certain types
of people being harassed to be a worthwhile concept, in-and-of itself.
So
for all I know, New Year’s Day may very well come about this year with many
people feeling the urge to light up and get “stoned” right at the moment the
countdown reaches zero and “Happy New Year.” Just don’t bother to invite me. I
can’t think of anything more deadly dull than a pot party, with people drugged
into a nonsensical stupor.
Besides,
it would still be illegal because it’s unlikely the pot purchase would have
been made from a licensed dispensary. And in the end, Illinois did all of this
because it wants the tax money!
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment