MADIGAN: The top GOP bullseye? |
As
in Michael Madigan, the speaker of the Illinois House of Representatives AND
chairman of the state Democratic Party.
ALL
THOSE VOICES who were gearing up to go through an election cycle next year screaming
and screeching about the need to get Emanuel out of political office will now
shift their focus for the need to “Dump Mike Madigan!” The man who has
literally been a state government official since the early 1970s and has been the
leader of Democrats in Springfield since 1983.
Emanuel
formally said Tuesday he wasn’t seeking re-election to a third mayoral term.
That led Gov. Bruce Rauner and Republican allies (he doesn’t have many) on
Wednesday to talk publicly about the need to put Madigan into retirement.
Not
that such talk is totally original. Rauner and Republicans in general have
campaigned for years on the theme that Mike Madigan is all that is evil about
government and that the esteemed “Mr. Speaker” needs to go.
But
Rauner and his allies made a point of touting their pledge that they want candidates
to campaign on – the idea that no one should serve as a legislative leader for
more than 10 years. Madigan has been one for nearly four decades, and in political
circles is regarded as a record-holder for lengthy tenure in a state
government.
EMANUEL: GOP didn't beat him at the polls |
ACTUALLY,
RAUNER ISN’T pushing to limit legislative leaders. He’s just looking to limit
Madigan. In fact, the governor specifically wouldn’t say that the Republican legislative
leader, Jim Durkin of Westchester, ought to face a limit on his service.
Which
makes all of this a batch of hooey (I could use cruder terms that would be more
accurate). Pure partisan politics at its worst.
Rauner
can’t figure out a way to get the voters to dump Madigan on Election Day, so he’s
trying to figure out ways of neutralizing Madigan while in office. Perhaps
reducing his role so much that Madigan would become bored and decide its
finally time for retirement.
RAUNER: Will he be the '18 political departure? |
Which
is a large part of the reason why I have always been suspicious of the concept
of term limits – I think voters ought to be able to pick whom they want, and if
they’re stupid enough to pick someone inept over and over, then perhaps they’re
getting what they deserve!
THERE’S
ALSO THE fact that Madigan’s true “offense” is that he’s not playing along with
the politically partisan vision that Rauner wanted to impose on state
government – which largely involves undermining the influence of organized
labor so as to benefit the financial interests of big business.
When
Rauner goes about making ridiculous comments about Madigan’s behavior being “criminal”
(as he has done in the past), it makes me wonder if the people of Illinois
picked a would-be tyrant for the office of governor.
As
I already wrote, perhaps we deserve a bit of suffering for making such a pick,
although 2018 is the chance we can try to impose a bit of logic back to our state
government when we cast ballots for governor.
As
for Madigan, he can be a strong-arm himself – one more than willing to play
power politics to get things done. Only in Madigan’s case, there is also just
enough of a soft touch that one doesn’t realize how hard he’s been knocked out
of the box. There’s a reason he got that nickname “The Velvet Hammer” all those
years ago.
BUT
IF MADIGAN truly unsettles the public mindset, he can be beaten. All political
people ultimately are beatable – even some of the biggest, most-established
names of politics have experienced losses by voters.
DURKIN: Nobody looking to dump GOP leader |
Particularly
since in Madigan’s case, all it would take to truly defeat him is to gain the
support of voters in one legislative district (as in the neighborhoods
surrounding Midway Airport). Those are the people for whom Madigan is the local
legislator – and I also don’t doubt they keep re-electing him because they like
the idea that their guy is the overall boss who gives orders to everybody else.
Instead,
we’re getting more and more evidence that Nov. 6 will be the Election Day that
does result in a significant incumbent loss – as in the departure of Bruce
Rauner following one term as governor.
Could
it really be that Election ’18 will go in the history books as the one in which
a majority of Illinoisans (particularly the two-thirds who live in metropolitan
Chicago) will see a choice of Rauner and Madigan, AND decide to keep the
latter?
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment